Tìm kiếm cho:
I am trying to make a <ul> slide down using CSS transitions.
The <ul> starts off at height: 0;. On hover, the height is set to height:auto;. However, this is causing it to simply appear, not transition,
If I do it from height: 40px; to height: auto;, then it will slide up to height: 0;, and then suddenly jump to the correct height.
How else could I do this without using JavaScript?
#child0 {
height: 0;
overflow: hidden;
background-color: #dedede;
-moz-transition: height 1s ease;
-webkit-transition: height 1s ease;
-o-transition: height 1s ease;
transition: height 1s ease;
}
#parent0:hover #child0 {
height: auto;
}
#child40 {
height: 40px;
overflow: hidden;
background-color: #dedede;
-moz-transition: height 1s ease;
-webkit-transition: height 1s ease;
-o-transition: height 1s ease;
transition: height 1s ease;
}
#parent40:hover #child40 {
height: auto;
}
h1 {
font-weight: bold;
}The only difference between the two snippets of CSS is one has height: 0, the other height: 40.
<hr>
<div id="parent0">
<h1>Hover me (height: 0)</h1>
<div id="child0">Some content
<br>Some content
<br>Some content
<br>Some content
<br>Some content
<br>Some content
<br>
</div>
</div>
<hr>
<div id="parent40">
<h1>Hover me (height: 40)</h1>
<div id="child40">Some content
<br>Some content
<br>Some content
<br>Some content
<br>Some content
<br>Some content
<br>
</div>
</div>height:auto/max-height solution will only work if you're expanding area is greater than the height you want to restrict. If you have a max-height of 300px, but a combo box dropdown, which can return 50px, then max-height won't help you, 50px is variable depending on the number of elements, you can arrive to an impossible situation where I can't fix it because the height is not fixed, height:auto was the solution, but I can't use transitions with this. - anyone Use max-height in the transition and not height. And set a value on max-height to something bigger than your box will ever get.
See JSFiddle demo provided by Chris Jordan in another answer here.
#menu #list {
max-height: 0;
transition: max-height 0.15s ease-out;
overflow: hidden;
background: #d5d5d5;
}
#menu:hover #list {
max-height: 500px;
transition: max-height 0.25s ease-in;
}<div id="menu">
<a>hover me</a>
<ul id="list">
<!-- Create a bunch, or not a bunch, of li's to see the timing. -->
<li>item</li>
<li>item</li>
<li>item</li>
<li>item</li>
<li>item</li>
</ul>
</div>Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
You should use scaleY instead.
ul {
background-color: #eee;
transform: scaleY(0);
transform-origin: top;
transition: transform 0.26s ease;
}
p:hover ~ ul {
transform: scaleY(1);
}<p>Hover This</p>
<ul>
<li>Coffee</li>
<li>Tea</li>
<li>Milk</li>
</ul>I've made a vendor prefixed version of the above code on jsfiddle, and changed your jsfiddle to use scaleY instead of height.
Edit
Some people do not like how scaleY transforms the content. If that is a problem then I suggest using clip instead.
ul {
clip: rect(auto, auto, 0, auto);
position: absolute;
margin: -1rem 0;
padding: .5rem;
color: white;
background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8);
transition-property: clip;
transition-duration: 0.5s;
transition-timing-function: cubic-bezier(0.175, 0.885, 0.32, 1.275);
}
h3:hover ~ ul,
h3:active ~ ul,
ul:hover {
clip: rect(auto, auto, 10rem, auto);
}<h3>Hover here</h3>
<ul>
<li>This list</li>
<li>is clipped.</li>
<li>A clip transition</li>
<li>will show it</li>
</ul>
<p>
Some text...
</p>Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
clip transform is no different than simply setting the max-height value. It still suffers from non-fixed amount of appearent animation delay with highly dynamic content size. - anyone You can't currently animate on height when one of the heights involved is auto, you have to set two explicit heights.
Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
The solution that I've always used was to first fade out, then shrink the font-size, padding and margin values. It doesn't look the same as a wipe, but it works without a static height or max-height.
Working example:
/* final display */
#menu #list {
margin: .5em 1em;
padding: 1em;
}
/* hide */
#menu:not(:hover) #list {
font-size: 0;
margin: 0;
opacity: 0;
padding: 0;
/* fade out, then shrink */
transition: opacity .25s,
font-size .5s .25s,
margin .5s .25s,
padding .5s .25s;
}
/* reveal */
#menu:hover #list {
/* unshrink, then fade in */
transition: font-size .25s,
margin .25s,
padding .25s,
opacity .5s .25s;
}<div id="menu">
<b>hover me</b>
<ul id="list">
<li>item</li>
<li>item</li>
<li>item</li>
<li>item</li>
<li>item</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p>Another paragraph...</p>Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
* and applying other changes. Buttons should've been affected by my above code, however, if they were correctly styled with em. - anyone This is a CSS-only solution with the following properties:
transform: scaleY(0)), so it does the right thing if there's content after the collapsible element.height: auto) state, the whole content always has the correct height (unlike e.g. if you pick a max-height that turns out to be too low). And in the collapsed state, the height is zero as it should.Here's a demo with three collapsible elements, all of different heights, that all use the same CSS. You might want to click "full page" after clicking "run snippet". Note that the JavaScript only toggles the collapsed CSS class, there's no measuring involved. (You could do this exact demo without any JavaScript at all by using a checkbox or :target). Also note that the part of the CSS that's responsible for the transition is pretty short, and the HTML only requires a single additional wrapper element.
$(function () {
$(".toggler").click(function () {
$(this).next().toggleClass("collapsed");
$(this).toggleClass("toggled"); // this just rotates the expander arrow
});
});.collapsible-wrapper {
display: flex;
overflow: hidden;
}
.collapsible-wrapper:after {
content: '';
height: 50px;
transition: height 0.3s linear, max-height 0s 0.3s linear;
max-height: 0px;
}
.collapsible {
transition: margin-bottom 0.3s cubic-bezier(0, 0, 0, 1);
margin-bottom: 0;
max-height: 1000000px;
}
.collapsible-wrapper.collapsed > .collapsible {
margin-bottom: -2000px;
transition: margin-bottom 0.3s cubic-bezier(1, 0, 1, 1),
visibility 0s 0.3s, max-height 0s 0.3s;
visibility: hidden;
max-height: 0;
}
.collapsible-wrapper.collapsed:after
{
height: 0;
transition: height 0.3s linear;
max-height: 50px;
}
/* END of the collapsible implementation; the stuff below
is just styling for this demo */
#container {
display: flex;
align-items: flex-start;
max-width: 1000px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
.menu {
border: 1px solid #ccc;
box-shadow: 0 1px 3px rgba(0,0,0,0.5);
margin: 20px;
}
.menu-item {
display: block;
background: linear-gradient(to bottom, #fff 0%,#eee 100%);
margin: 0;
padding: 1em;
line-height: 1.3;
}
.collapsible .menu-item {
border-left: 2px solid #888;
border-right: 2px solid #888;
background: linear-gradient(to bottom, #eee 0%,#ddd 100%);
}
.menu-item.toggler {
background: linear-gradient(to bottom, #aaa 0%,#888 100%);
color: white;
cursor: pointer;
}
.menu-item.toggler:before {
content: '';
display: block;
border-left: 8px solid white;
border-top: 8px solid transparent;
border-bottom: 8px solid transparent;
width: 0;
height: 0;
float: right;
transition: transform 0.3s ease-out;
}
.menu-item.toggler.toggled:before {
transform: rotate(90deg);
}
body { font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px; }
*, *:after {
box-sizing: border-box;
}<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div id="container">
<div class="menu">
<div class="menu-item">Something involving a holodeck</div>
<div class="menu-item">Send an away team</div>
<div class="menu-item toggler">Advanced solutions</div>
<div class="collapsible-wrapper collapsed">
<div class="collapsible">
<div class="menu-item">Separate saucer</div>
<div class="menu-item">Send an away team that includes the captain (despite Riker's protest)</div>
<div class="menu-item">Ask Worf</div>
<div class="menu-item">Something involving Wesley, the 19th century, and a holodeck</div>
<div class="menu-item">Ask Q for help</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="menu-item">Sweet-talk the alien aggressor</div>
<div class="menu-item">Re-route power from auxiliary systems</div>
</div>
<div class="menu">
<div class="menu-item">Something involving a holodeck</div>
<div class="menu-item">Send an away team</div>
<div class="menu-item toggler">Advanced solutions</div>
<div class="collapsible-wrapper collapsed">
<div class="collapsible">
<div class="menu-item">Separate saucer</div>
<div class="menu-item">Send an away team that includes the captain (despite Riker's protest)</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="menu-item">Sweet-talk the alien aggressor</div>
<div class="menu-item">Re-route power from auxiliary systems</div>
</div>
<div class="menu">
<div class="menu-item">Something involving a holodeck</div>
<div class="menu-item">Send an away team</div>
<div class="menu-item toggler">Advanced solutions</div>
<div class="collapsible-wrapper collapsed">
<div class="collapsible">
<div class="menu-item">Separate saucer</div>
<div class="menu-item">Send an away team that includes the captain (despite Riker's protest)</div>
<div class="menu-item">Ask Worf</div>
<div class="menu-item">Something involving Wesley, the 19th century, and a holodeck</div>
<div class="menu-item">Ask Q for help</div>
<div class="menu-item">Separate saucer</div>
<div class="menu-item">Send an away team that includes the captain (despite Riker's protest)</div>
<div class="menu-item">Ask Worf</div>
<div class="menu-item">Something involving Wesley, the 19th century, and a holodeck</div>
<div class="menu-item">Ask Q for help</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="menu-item">Sweet-talk the alien aggressor</div>
<div class="menu-item">Re-route power from auxiliary systems</div>
</div>
</div>There are in fact two transitions involved in making this happen. One of them transitions the margin-bottom from 0px (in the expanded state) to -2000px in the collapsed state (similar to this answer). The 2000 here is the first magic number, it's based on the assumption that your box won't be higher than this (2000 pixels seems like a reasonable choice).
Using the margin-bottom transition alone by itself has two issues:
margin-bottom: -2000px won't hide everything -- there'll be visible stuff even in the collapsed case. This is a minor fix that we'll do later.Fixing this second issue is where the second transition comes in, and this transition conceptually targets the wrapper's minimum height ("conceptually" because we're not actually using the min-height property for this; more on that later).
Here's an animation that shows how combining the bottom margin transition with the minimum height transition, both of equal duration, gives us a combined transition from full height to zero height that has the same duration.
The left bar shows how the negative bottom margin pushes the bottom upwards, reducing the visible height. The middle bar shows how the minimum height ensures that in the collapsing case, the transition doesn't end early, and in the expanding case, the transition doesn't start late. The right bar shows how the combination of the two causes the box to transition from full height to zero height in the correct amount of time.
For my demo I've settled on 50px as the upper minimum height value. This is the second magic number, and it should be lower than the box' height would ever be. 50px seems reasonable as well; it seems unlikely that you'd very often want to make an element collapsible that isn't even 50 pixels high in the first place.
As you can see in the animation, the resulting transition is continuous, but it is not differentiable -- at the moment when the minimum height is equal to the full height adjusted by the bottom margin, there is a sudden change in speed. This is very noticeable in the animation because it uses a linear timing function for both transitions, and because the whole transition is very slow. In the actual case (my demo at the top), the transition only takes 300ms, and the bottom margin transition is not linear. I've played around with a lot of different timing functions for both transitions, and the ones I ended up with felt like they worked best for the widest variety of cases.
Two problems remain to fix:
We solve the first problem by giving the container element a max-height: 0 in the collapsed case, with a 0s 0.3s transition. This means that it's not really a transition, but the max-height is applied with a delay; it only applies once the transition is over. For this to work correctly, we also need to pick a numerical max-height for the opposite, non-collapsed, state. But unlike in the 2000px case, where picking too large of a number affects the quality of the transition, in this case, it really doesn't matter. So we can just pick a number that is so high that we know that no height will ever come close to this. I picked a million pixels. If you feel you may need to support content of a height of more than a million pixels, then 1) I'm sorry, and 2) just add a couple of zeros.
The second problem is the reason why we're not actually using min-height for the minimum height transition. Instead, there is an ::after pseudo-element in the container with a height that transitions from 50px to zero. This has the same effect as a min-height: It won't let the container shrink below whatever height the pseudo-element currently has. But because we're using height, not min-height, we can now use max-height (once again applied with a delay) to set the pseudo-element's actual height to zero once the transition is over, ensuring that at least outside the transition, even small elements have the correct height. Because min-height is stronger than max-height, this wouldn't work if we used the container's min-height instead of the pseudo-element's height. Just like the max-height in the previous paragraph, this max-height also needs a value for the opposite end of the transition. But in this case we can just pick the 50px.
Tested in Chrome (Win, Mac, Android, iOS), Firefox (Win, Mac, Android), Edge, IE11 (except for a flexbox layout issue with my demo that I didn't bother debugging), and Safari (Mac, iOS). Speaking of flexbox, it should be possible to make this work without using any flexbox; in fact I think you could make almost everything work in IE7 – except for the fact that you won't have CSS transitions, making it a rather pointless exercise.
Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
You can, with a little bit of non-semantic jiggery-pokery. My usual approach is to animate the height of an outer DIV which has a single child which is a style-less DIV used only for measuring the content height.
function growDiv() {
var growDiv = document.getElementById('grow');
if (growDiv.clientHeight) {
growDiv.style.height = 0;
} else {
var wrapper = document.querySelector('.measuringWrapper');
growDiv.style.height = wrapper.clientHeight + "px";
}
}#grow {
-moz-transition: height .5s;
-ms-transition: height .5s;
-o-transition: height .5s;
-webkit-transition: height .5s;
transition: height .5s;
height: 0;
overflow: hidden;
outline: 1px solid red;
}<input type="button" onclick="growDiv()" value="grow">
<div id='grow'>
<div class='measuringWrapper'>
<div>
The contents of my div.
</div>
<div>
The contents of my div.
</div>
<div>
The contents of my div.
</div>
<div>
The contents of my div.
</div>
<div>
The contents of my div.
</div>
<div>
The contents of my div.
</div>
</div>
</div>One would like to just be able to dispense with the .measuringWrapper and just set the DIV's height to auto and have that animate, but that doesn't seem to work (the height gets set, but no animation occurs).
function growDiv() {
var growDiv = document.getElementById('grow');
if (growDiv.clientHeight) {
growDiv.style.height = 0;
} else {
growDiv.style.height = 'auto';
}
}#grow {
-moz-transition: height .5s;
-ms-transition: height .5s;
-o-transition: height .5s;
-webkit-transition: height .5s;
transition: height .5s;
height: 0;
overflow: hidden;
outline: 1px solid red;
}<input type="button" onclick="growDiv()" value="grow">
<div id='grow'>
<div>
The contents of my div.
</div>
<div>
The contents of my div.
</div>
<div>
The contents of my div.
</div>
<div>
The contents of my div.
</div>
<div>
The contents of my div.
</div>
<div>
The contents of my div.
</div>
</div>My interpretation is that an explicit height is needed for the animation to run. You can't get an animation on height when either height (the start or end height) is auto.
Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
folder.style.transition = `height ${maxHeight}ms`; - anyone The accepted answer works for most cases, but it doesn't work well when your div can vary greatly in height — the animation speed is not dependent on the actual height of the content, and it can look choppy.
You can still perform the actual animation with CSS, but you need to use JavaScript to compute the height of the items, instead of trying to use auto. No jQuery is required, although you may have to modify this a bit if you want compatibility (works in the latest version of Chrome :)).
window.toggleExpand = function(element) {
if (!element.style.height || element.style.height == '0px') {
element.style.height = Array.prototype.reduce.call(element.childNodes, function(p, c) {return p + (c.offsetHeight || 0);}, 0) + 'px';
} else {
element.style.height = '0px';
}
}#menu #list {
height: 0px;
transition: height 0.3s ease;
background: #d5d5d5;
overflow: hidden;
}<div id="menu">
<input value="Toggle list" type="button" onclick="toggleExpand(document.getElementById('list'));">
<ul id="list">
<!-- Works well with dynamically-sized content. -->
<li>item</li>
<li><div style="height: 100px; width: 100px; background: red;"></div></li>
<li>item</li>
<li>item</li>
<li>item</li>
</ul>
</div>Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
scrollHeight when the height is 0. - anyone element.style.height = element.scrollHeight + 'px' - anyone My workaround is to transition max-height to the exact content height for a nice smooth animation, then use a transitionEnd callback to set max-height to 9999px so the content can resize freely.
var content = $('#content');
content.inner = $('#content .inner'); // inner div needed to get size of content when closed
// css transition callback
content.on('transitionEnd webkitTransitionEnd transitionend oTransitionEnd msTransitionEnd', function(e){
if(content.hasClass('open')){
content.css('max-height', 9999); // try setting this to 'none'... I dare you!
}
});
$('#toggle').on('click', function(e){
content.toggleClass('open closed');
content.contentHeight = content.outerHeight();
if(content.hasClass('closed')){
// disable transitions & set max-height to content height
content.removeClass('transitions').css('max-height', content.contentHeight);
setTimeout(function(){
// enable & start transition
content.addClass('transitions').css({
'max-height': 0,
'opacity': 0
});
}, 10); // 10ms timeout is the secret ingredient for disabling/enabling transitions
// chrome only needs 1ms but FF needs ~10ms or it chokes on the first animation for some reason
}else if(content.hasClass('open')){
content.contentHeight += content.inner.outerHeight(); // if closed, add inner height to content height
content.css({
'max-height': content.contentHeight,
'opacity': 1
});
}
});.transitions {
transition: all 0.5s ease-in-out;
-webkit-transition: all 0.5s ease-in-out;
-moz-transition: all 0.5s ease-in-out;
}
body {
font-family:Arial;
line-height: 3ex;
}
code {
display: inline-block;
background: #fafafa;
padding: 0 1ex;
}
#toggle {
display:block;
padding:10px;
margin:10px auto;
text-align:center;
width:30ex;
}
#content {
overflow:hidden;
margin:10px;
border:1px solid #666;
background:#efefef;
opacity:1;
}
#content .inner {
padding:10px;
overflow:auto;
}<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.7.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div id="content" class="open">
<div class="inner">
<h3>Smooth CSS Transitions Between <code>height: 0</code> and <code>height: auto</code></h3>
<p>A clever workaround is to use <code>max-height</code> instead of <code>height</code>, and set it to something bigger than your content. Problem is the browser uses this value to calculate transition duration. So if you set it to <code>max-height: 1000px</code> but the content is only 100px high, the animation will be 10x too fast.</p>
<p>Another option is to measure the content height with JS and transition to that fixed value, but then you have to keep track of the content and manually resize it if it changes.</p>
<p>This solution is a hybrid of the two - transition to the measured content height, then set it to <code>max-height: 9999px</code> after the transition for fluid content sizing.</p>
</div>
</div>
<br />
<button id="toggle">Challenge Accepted!</button>Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
scrollHeight and then immediately to 0, Chrome doesn’t consistently animate it because of how quickly the properties change. Adding a timeout between the two changes worked, but the magic delay number is unknown and it adds an uncomfortable delay to the transition. Any ideas on a solution for that? - anyone A visual workaround to animating height using CSS3 transitions is to animate the padding instead.
You don't quite get the full wipe effect, but playing around with the transition-duration and padding values should get you close enough. If you don't want to explicitly set height/max-height, this should be what you're looking for.
div {
height: 0;
overflow: hidden;
padding: 0 18px;
-webkit-transition: all .5s ease;
-moz-transition: all .5s ease;
transition: all .5s ease;
}
div.animated {
height: auto;
padding: 24px 18px;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/catharsis/n5XfG/17/ (riffed off stephband's above jsFiddle)
Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
Use max-height with different transition easing and delay for each state.
HTML:
<a href="#" id="trigger">Hover</a>
<ul id="toggled">
<li>One</li>
<li>Two</li>
<li>Three</li>
<ul>
CSS:
#toggled{
max-height: 0px;
transition: max-height .8s cubic-bezier(0, 1, 0, 1) -.1s;
}
#trigger:hover + #toggled{
max-height: 9999px;
transition-timing-function: cubic-bezier(0.5, 0, 1, 0);
transition-delay: 0s;
}
See example: http://jsfiddle.net/0hnjehjc/1/
Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
999999px. This, on the other hand, will shift your animation, because the frames are calculated from this value. So you might end up with animation "delay" in one direction and a really fast end in the other direction (corr: timing-functions) - anyone According to MDN Web Docs, auto values have been intentionally excluded from the CSS transitions spec, so instead of height: auto, use height: 100%, top, or the flex property in grid and flex layouts.
.grid-container {
display: grid;
position: absolute;
}
.content {
background: aqua;
height: 0;
overflow: hidden;
transition: 1s;
}
span:hover + .grid-container .content {
height: 100%;
}<span>Hover over me!</span>
<div class="grid-container">
<div class="content">Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.</div>
</div>
<p>Rest of the page content...</p>.grid-container {
display: grid;
position: absolute;
overflow: hidden;
pointer-events: none; /* to enable interaction with elements below the container */
}
.content {
background: aqua;
pointer-events: auto;
position: relative;
top: -100%;
transition: 1s;
}
span:hover + .grid-container .content {
top: 0;
}<span>Hover over me!</span>
<div class="grid-container">
<div class="content">Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.</div>
</div>
<p>Rest of the page content...</p>Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
Expanding/collapsing in the document flow but it doesn't work as the container has a defined height so the rest of the content will be affected, the content outside the container, - anyone divs in place of html and body, but I don't think the issue with two or more elements next to each other can be resolved. - anyone No hard coded values.
No JavaScript.
No approximations.
The trick is to use a hidden & duplicated div to get the browser to understand what 100% means.
This method is suitable whenever you're able to duplicate the DOM of the element you wish to animate.
.outer {
border: dashed red 1px;
position: relative;
}
.dummy {
visibility: hidden;
}
.real {
position: absolute;
background: yellow;
height: 0;
transition: height 0.5s;
overflow: hidden;
}
.outer:hover>.real {
height: 100%;
}Hover over the box below:
<div class="outer">
<!-- The actual element that you'd like to animate -->
<div class="real">
unpredictable content unpredictable content unpredictable content unpredictable content unpredictable content unpredictable content unpredictable content unpredictable content unpredictable content unpredictable content unpredictable content unpredictable
content unpredictable content unpredictable content unpredictable content
</div>
<!-- An exact copy of the element you'd like to animate. -->
<div class="dummy" aria-hidden="true">
unpredictable content unpredictable content unpredictable content unpredictable content unpredictable content unpredictable content unpredictable content unpredictable content unpredictable content unpredictable content unpredictable content unpredictable
content unpredictable content unpredictable content unpredictable content
</div>
</div>Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
As I post this there are over 30 answers already, but I feel my answer improves on the already accepted answer by jake.
I was not content with the issue that arises from simply using max-height and CSS3 transitions, since as many commenters noted, you have to set your max-height value very close to the actual height or you'll get a delay. See this JSFiddle for an example of that problem.
To get around this (while still using no JavaScript), I added another HTML element that transitions the transform: translateY CSS value.
This means both max-height and translateY are used: max-height allows the element to push down elements below it, while translateY gives the "instant" effect we want. The issue with max-height still exists, but its effect is lessened.
This means you can set a much larger height for your max-height value and worry about it less.
The overall benefit is that on the transition back in (the collapse), the user sees the translateY animation immediately, so it doesn't really matter how long the max-height takes.
body {
font-family: sans-serif;
}
.toggle {
position: relative;
border: 2px solid #333;
border-radius: 3px;
margin: 5px;
width: 200px;
}
.toggle-header {
margin: 0;
padding: 10px;
background-color: #333;
color: white;
text-align: center;
cursor: pointer;
}
.toggle-height {
background-color: tomato;
overflow: hidden;
transition: max-height .6s ease;
max-height: 0;
}
.toggle:hover .toggle-height {
max-height: 1000px;
}
.toggle-transform {
padding: 5px;
color: white;
transition: transform .4s ease;
transform: translateY(-100%);
}
.toggle:hover .toggle-transform {
transform: translateY(0);
}<div class="toggle">
<div class="toggle-header">
Toggle!
</div>
<div class="toggle-height">
<div class="toggle-transform">
<p>Content!</p>
<p>Content!</p>
<p>Content!</p>
<p>Content!</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="toggle">
<div class="toggle-header">
Toggle!
</div>
<div class="toggle-height">
<div class="toggle-transform">
<p>Content!</p>
<p>Content!</p>
<p>Content!</p>
<p>Content!</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
No max-height, uses relative positioning, works on li elements, & is pure CSS:
I have not tested in anything but Firefox, though judging by the CSS, it should work on all browsers.
FIDDLE: http://jsfiddle.net/n5XfG/2596/
CSS
.wrap { overflow:hidden; }
.inner {
margin-top:-100%;
-webkit-transition:margin-top 500ms;
transition:margin-top 500ms;
}
.inner.open { margin-top:0px; }
HTML
<div class="wrap">
<div class="inner">Some Cool Content</div>
</div>
Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
EDIT: Scroll down for updated answer
I was making a drop down list and saw this Post ... many different answers but I decide to share my drop down list too, ... It's not perfect but at least it will using only css for drop down! I've been using transform:translateY(y) to transform the list to the view ...
You can see more in the test
http://jsfiddle.net/BVEpc/4/
I've placed div behind every li because my drop down list are coming from up and to show them properly this was needed, my div code is:
#menu div {
transition: 0.5s 1s;
z-index:-1;
-webkit-transform:translateY(-100%);
-webkit-transform-origin: top;
}
and hover is :
#menu > li:hover div {
transition: 0.5s;
-webkit-transform:translateY(0);
}
and because ul height is set to the content it can get over your body content that's why I did this for ul:
#menu ul {
transition: 0s 1.5s;
visibility:hidden;
overflow:hidden;
}
and hover:
#menu > li:hover ul {
transition:none;
visibility:visible;
}
the second time after transition is delay and it will get hidden after my drop down list has been closed animately ...
Hope later someone get benefit of this one.
EDIT: I just can't believe ppl actually using this prototype! this drop down menu is only for one sub menu and that's all!!
I've updated a better one that can have two sub menu for both ltr and rtl direction with IE 8 support.
Fiddle for LTR
Fiddle for RTL
hopefully someone find this useful in future.
Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
A lot of answers, some better than other, most using JS. I believe I figured this out in two use-cases that are easy to understand.
.demo01 {
overflow: hidden;
position: absolute;
pointer-events: none;
}
.demo01__content {
background: lightgray;
padding: 1rem;
pointer-events: all;
transform: translateY(-100%);
transition: transform 1s, visibility 1s;
visibility: hidden;
}
:checked ~ .demo01 .demo01__content {
transform: translateY(0);
visibility: visible;
}<input type="checkbox" /> ⬅︎ Toggle
<div>Something before 🙃</div>
<div class="demo01">
<div class="demo01__content">
This content should…<br />
toggle! 👻
</div>
</div>
<div>Something after 🙂</div>.demo02 {
display: grid;
grid-template-rows: 0fr;
overflow: hidden;
transition: grid-template-rows 1s;
}
.demo02__content {
align-self: end;
min-height: 0;
background: lightgray;
transition: visibility 1s;
visibility: hidden;
}
.demo02__padding {
padding: 1rem;
}
:checked ~ .demo02 {
grid-template-rows: 1fr;
}
:checked ~ .demo02 .demo02__content {
visibility: visible;
}<input type="checkbox" /> ⬅︎ Toggle
<div>Something before 🙃</div>
<div class="demo02">
<div class="demo02__content">
<div class="demo02__padding">
This content should…<br />
toggle! 👻
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>Something after 🙂</div>I wrote a blog post about these techniques.
Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
You can transition from height:0 to height:auto providing that you also provide min-height and max-height.
div.stretchy{
transition: 1s linear;
}
div.stretchy.hidden{
height: 0;
}
div.stretchy.visible{
height: auto;
min-height:40px;
max-height:400px;
}
Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
height, just max-height. height will instantly jump from 0 to auto, while max-height will transition which seems to work, but creates the same problem as other answers try to address. - anyone Flexbox Solution
Pros:
Cons:
The way it works is by always having flex-basis: auto on the element with content, and transitioning flex-grow and flex-shrink instead.
Edit: Improved JS Fiddle inspired by the Xbox One interface.
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
box-sizing: border-box;
transition: 0.25s;
font-family: monospace;
}
body {
margin: 10px 0 0 10px;
}
.box {
width: 150px;
height: 150px;
margin: 0 2px 10px 0;
background: #2d333b;
border: solid 10px #20262e;
overflow: hidden;
display: inline-flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.space {
flex-basis: 100%;
flex-grow: 1;
flex-shrink: 0;
}
p {
flex-basis: auto;
flex-grow: 0;
flex-shrink: 1;
background: #20262e;
padding: 10px;
width: 100%;
text-align: left;
color: white;
}
.box:hover .space {
flex-grow: 0;
flex-shrink: 1;
}
.box:hover p {
flex-grow: 1;
flex-shrink: 0;
}<div class="box">
<div class="space"></div>
<p>
Super Metroid Prime Fusion
</p>
</div>
<div class="box">
<div class="space"></div>
<p>
Resident Evil 2 Remake
</p>
</div>
<div class="box">
<div class="space"></div>
<p>
Yolo The Game
</p>
</div>
<div class="box">
<div class="space"></div>
<p>
Final Fantasy 7 Remake + All Additional DLC + Golden Tophat
</p>
</div>
<div class="box">
<div class="space"></div>
<p>
DerpVille
</p>
</div>Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
One sentence solution: Use padding transition. It's enough for most of cases such as accordion, and even better because it's fast due to that the padding value is often not big.
If you want the animation process to be better, just raise the padding value.
.parent{ border-top: #999 1px solid;}
h1{ margin: .5rem; font-size: 1.3rem}
.children {
height: 0;
overflow: hidden;
background-color: #dedede;
transition: padding .2s ease-in-out, opacity .2s ease-in-out;
padding: 0 .5rem;
opacity: 0;
}
.children::before, .children::after{ content: "";display: block;}
.children::before{ margin-top: -2rem;}
.children::after{ margin-bottom: -2rem;}
.parent:hover .children {
height: auto;
opacity: 1;
padding: 2.5rem .5rem;/* 0.5 + abs(-2), make sure it's less than expected min-height */
}<div class="parent">
<h1>Hover me</h1>
<div class="children">Some content
<br>Some content
<br>Some content
<br>Some content
<br>Some content
<br>Some content
<br>
</div>
</div>
<div class="parent">
<h1>Hover me(long content)</h1>
<div class="children">Some content
<br>Some content<br>Some content
<br>Some content<br>Some content
<br>Some content<br>Some content
<br>Some content<br>Some content
<br>Some content<br>Some content
<br>
</div>
</div>
<div class="parent">
<h1>Hover me(short content)</h1>
<div class="children">Some content
<br>Some content
<br>Some content
<br>
</div>
</div>Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
Expanding on @jake's answer, the transition will go all the way to the max height value, causing an extremely fast animation - if you set the transitions for both :hover and off you can then control the crazy speed a little bit more.
So the li:hover is when the mouse enters the state and then the transition on the non-hovered property will be the mouse leave.
Hopefully this will be of some help.
e.g:
.sidemenu li ul {
max-height: 0px;
-webkit-transition: all .3s ease;
-moz-transition: all .3s ease;
-o-transition: all .3s ease;
-ms-transition: all .3s ease;
transition: all .3s ease;
}
.sidemenu li:hover ul {
max-height: 500px;
-webkit-transition: all 1s ease;
-moz-transition: all 1s ease;
-o-transition: all 1s ease;
-ms-transition: all 1s ease;
transition: all 1s ease;
}
/* Adjust speeds to the possible height of the list */
Here's a fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/BukwJ/
Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
You could do this by creating a reverse (collapse) animation with clip-path.
#child0 {
display: none;
}
#parent0:hover #child0 {
display: block;
animation: height-animation;
animation-duration: 200ms;
animation-timing-function: linear;
animation-fill-mode: backwards;
animation-iteration-count: 1;
animation-delay: 200ms;
}
@keyframes height-animation {
0% {
clip-path: polygon(0% 0%, 100% 0.00%, 100% 0%, 0% 0%);
}
100% {
clip-path: polygon(0% 0%, 100% 0.00%, 100% 100%, 0% 100%);
}
}<div id="parent0">
<h1>Hover me (height: 0)</h1>
<div id="child0">Some content
<br>Some content
<br>Some content
<br>Some content
<br>Some content
<br>Some content
<br>
</div>
</div>Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
I understand the question asks for a solution without JavaScript. But for those interested here's my solution using just a little bit of JS.
ok, so the element's css whose height will change by default is set to height: 0; and when open height: auto;. It also has transition: height .25s ease-out;. But of course the problem is that it won't transition to or from height: auto;
So what i've done is when opening or closing set the height to the scrollHeight property of the element. This new inline style will have higher specificity and override both height: auto; and height: 0; and the transition runs.
When opening i add a transitionend event listener which will run just once then remove the inline style setting it back to height: auto; which will allow the element to resize if necessary, as in this more complex example with sub menus https://codepen.io/ninjabonsai/pen/GzYyVe
When closing i remove the inline style right after the next event loop cycle by using setTimeout with no delay. This means height: auto; is temporarily overridden which allows the transition back to height 0;
const showHideElement = (element, open) => {
element.style.height = element.scrollHeight + 'px';
element.classList.toggle('open', open);
if (open) {
element.addEventListener('transitionend', () => {
element.style.removeProperty('height');
}, {
once: true
});
} else {
window.setTimeout(() => {
element.style.removeProperty('height');
});
}
}
const menu = document.body.querySelector('#menu');
const list = document.body.querySelector('#menu > ul')
menu.addEventListener('mouseenter', () => showHideElement(list, true));
menu.addEventListener('mouseleave', () => showHideElement(list, false));#menu > ul {
height: 0;
overflow: hidden;
background-color: #999;
transition: height .25s ease-out;
}
#menu > ul.open {
height: auto;
}<div id="menu">
<a>hover me</a>
<ul>
<li>item</li>
<li>item</li>
<li>item</li>
<li>item</li>
<li>item</li>
</ul>
</div>Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
This solution uses a few techniques:
padding-bottom:100% 'hack' where percentages are defined in terms of the current width of the element. More info on this technique.The upshot though is that we get performant transitioning using CSS only, and a single transition function to smoothly achieve the transition; the holy grail!
Of course, there's a downside! I can't work out how to control the width at which content gets cut off (overflow:hidden); because of the padding-bottom hack, the width and height are intimately related. There may be a way though, so will come back to it.
https://jsfiddle.net/EoghanM/n1rp3zb4/28/
body {
padding: 1em;
}
.trigger {
font-weight: bold;
}
/* .expander is there for float clearing purposes only */
.expander::after {
content: '';
display: table;
clear: both;
}
.outer {
float: left; /* purpose: shrink to fit content */
border: 1px solid green;
overflow: hidden;
}
.inner {
transition: padding-bottom 0.3s ease-in-out; /* or whatever crazy transition function you can come up with! */
padding-bottom: 0%; /* percentage padding is defined in terms of width. The width at this level is equal to the height of the content */
height: 0;
/* unfortunately, change of writing mode has other bad effects like orientation of cursor */
writing-mode: vertical-rl;
cursor: default; /* don't want the vertical-text (sideways I-beam) */
transform: rotate(-90deg) translateX(-100%); /* undo writing mode */
transform-origin: 0 0;
margin: 0; /* left/right margins here will add to height */
}
.inner > div { white-space: nowrap; }
.expander:hover .inner, /* to keep open when expanded */
.trigger:hover+.expander .inner {
padding-bottom: 100%;
}<div class="trigger">HoverMe</div>
<div class="expander">
<div class="outer">
<div class="inner">
<div>First Item</div>
<div>Content</div>
<div>Content</div>
<div>Content</div>
<div>Long Content can't be wider than outer height unfortunately</div>
<div>Last Item</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
after content</div>
</div>Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
I've recently been transitioning the max-height on the li elements rather than the wrapping ul.
The reasoning is that the delay for small max-heights is far less noticeable (if at all) compared to large max-heights, and I can also set my max-height value relative to the font-size of the li rather than some arbitrary huge number by using ems or rems.
If my font size is 1rem, I'll set my max-height to something like 3rem (to accommodate wrapped text). You can see an example here:
http://codepen.io/mindfullsilence/pen/DtzjE
Update: CSS has evolved to include much more elegant techniques since I wrote this answer. I believe the best today is by using css grid and grid-template-row as described in this answer: https://stackoverflow.com/a/69802208/3594432
Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
Flexible Height CSS Only Solution
I've stumbled upon a quirky solution using flex behavior. It works in at least Chrome and Firefox.
First, the height transition only works between 0 and 100%, two numeric values. Since "auto" is not a numeric value, fractional increments don't exist between 0 and "auto". 100% is a flexible value, so no specific height is required.
Second, both the outer container and the inner container of the hidden content must be set to display: flex with flex-direction: column.
Third, the outer container must have a height property. Setting it to 0 maintains a smooth transition only when everything is contained in the outer container because the flex behavior takes precedence over the height. Edit: Json suggested using height: fit-content, so that any content below the container is also pushed down.
.outer-container { height: 0; display: flex; flex-direction: column; }
.inner-container { display: flex; flex-direction: column; }
.hidden-content {
height: 0;
opacity: 0;
transition: height 1s 0.5s ease-in-out, opacity 0.5s ease-in-out;
/* transition out: first fade out opacity, then shrink height after a delay equal to the opacity duration */
}
.trigger:hover + .inner-container > .hidden-content {
height: 100%;
opacity: 1;
transition: height 1s ease-in-out, opacity 0.5s 1s ease-in-out;
/* transition in: first expand height, then fade in opacity after a delay equal to the height duration */
}<div class="outer-container">
<a href="#" class="trigger">Hover to Reveal Inner Container's Hidden Content</a>
<div class="inner-container">
<div class="hidden-content">This is hidden content. When triggered by hover, its height transitions from 0 to 100%, which pushes other content in the same container down gradually.</div>
<div>Within the same container, this other content is pushed down gradually as the hidden content's height transitions from 0 to 100%.</div>
</div>
</div>Press the Run Code Snippet button to see the transition in action. It's CSS only, with no specific height.
Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
overflow: hidden. Looks good to me, however, since the outer-container has 0 height, it doesn't resize the parent height, which might not be desired. play.tailwindcss.com/aFH08CKXpU - anyone Alternate CSS-only solution with line-height, padding, opacity and margin:
body {
background-color: linen;
}
main {
background-color: white;
}
[id^="toggle_"] ~ .content {
line-height: 0;
opacity: 0;
padding: 0 .5rem;
transition: .2s ease-out;
}
[id^="toggle_"] ~ .content > p {
margin: 0;
transition: .2s ease-out;
}
[id^="toggle_"]:checked ~ .content {
opacity: 1;
padding: .5rem;
line-height: 1.5;
}
[id^="toggle_"]:checked ~ .content p {
margin-bottom: .75rem;
}
[id^="toggle_"] + label {
display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
padding: 0.5em 1em;
background: lightsteelblue;
border-bottom: 1px solid gray;
cursor: pointer;
}
[id^="toggle_"] + label:before {
content: "Show";
}
[id^="toggle_"]:checked + label:before {
content: "Hide";
}
[id^="toggle_"] + label:after {
content: "\25BC";
}
[id^="toggle_"]:checked + label:after {
content: "\25B2";
}<main>
<div>
<input type="checkbox" id="toggle_1" hidden>
<label for="toggle_1" hidden></label>
<div class="content">
<p>
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Duis dolor neque, commodo quis leo ut, auctor tincidunt mauris. Nunc fringilla tincidunt metus, non gravida lorem condimentum non. Duis ornare purus nisl, at porta arcu eleifend eget. Integer lorem ante, porta vulputate dui ut, blandit tempor tellus. Proin facilisis bibendum diam, sit amet rutrum est feugiat ut. Mauris rhoncus convallis arcu in condimentum. Donec volutpat dui eu mollis vulputate. Nunc commodo lobortis nunc at ultrices. Suspendisse in lobortis diam. Suspendisse eget vestibulum ex.
</p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<input type="checkbox" id="toggle_2" hidden>
<label for="toggle_2" hidden></label>
<div class="content">
<p>
Maecenas laoreet nunc sit amet nulla ultrices auctor. Vivamus sed nisi vitae nibh condimentum pulvinar eu vel lorem. Sed pretium viverra eros ut facilisis. In ut fringilla magna. Sed a tempor libero. Donec sapien libero, lacinia sed aliquet ut, imperdiet finibus tellus. Nunc tellus lectus, rhoncus in posuere quis, tempus sit amet enim. Morbi et erat ac velit fringilla dignissim. Donec commodo, est id accumsan cursus, diam dui hendrerit nisi, vel hendrerit purus dolor ut risus. Phasellus mattis egestas ipsum sed ullamcorper. In diam ligula, rhoncus vel enim et, imperdiet porta justo. Curabitur vulputate hendrerit nisl, et ultricies diam. Maecenas ac leo a diam cursus ornare nec eu quam.
</p>
<p>Sed non vulputate purus, sed consectetur odio. Sed non nibh fringilla, imperdiet odio nec, efficitur ex. Suspendisse ut dignissim enim. Maecenas felis augue, tempor sit amet sem fringilla, accumsan fringilla nibh. Quisque posuere lacus tortor, quis malesuada magna elementum a. Nullam id purus in ante molestie tincidunt. Morbi luctus orci eu egestas dignissim. Sed tincidunt, libero quis scelerisque bibendum, ligula nisi gravida libero, id lacinia nulla leo in elit.
</p>
<p>Aenean aliquam risus id consectetur sagittis. Aliquam aliquam nisl eu augue accumsan, vel maximus lorem viverra. Aliquam ipsum dolor, tempor et justo ac, fermentum mattis dui. Etiam at posuere ligula. Vestibulum tortor metus, viverra vitae mi non, laoreet iaculis purus. Praesent vel semper nibh. Curabitur a congue lacus. In et pellentesque lorem. Morbi posuere felis non diam vulputate, non vulputate ex vehicula. Vivamus ultricies, massa id sagittis consequat, sem mauris tincidunt nunc, eu vehicula augue quam ut mauris.
</p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<input type="checkbox" id="toggle_3" hidden>
<label for="toggle_3" hidden></label>
<div class="content">
<p>
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Duis dolor neque, commodo quis leo ut, auctor tincidunt mauris. Nunc fringilla tincidunt metus, non gravida lorem condimentum non. Duis ornare purus nisl, at porta arcu eleifend eget. Integer lorem ante, porta vulputate dui ut, blandit tempor tellus. Proin facilisis bibendum diam, sit amet rutrum est feugiat ut. Mauris rhoncus convallis arcu in condimentum. Donec volutpat dui eu mollis vulputate. Nunc commodo lobortis nunc at ultrices. Suspendisse in lobortis diam. Suspendisse eget vestibulum ex.
</p>
<p>Sed non vulputate purus, sed consectetur odio. Sed non nibh fringilla, imperdiet odio nec, efficitur ex. Suspendisse ut dignissim enim. Maecenas felis augue, tempor sit amet sem fringilla, accumsan fringilla nibh. Quisque posuere lacus tortor, quis malesuada magna elementum a. Nullam id purus in ante molestie tincidunt. Morbi luctus orci eu egestas dignissim. Sed tincidunt, libero quis scelerisque bibendum, ligula nisi gravida libero, id lacinia nulla leo in elit.
</p>
</div>
</div>
</main>Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
pointer-events: none by default and auto when checked (to the content), just to get rid of the text selection pointer and to get rid of the ability to select invisible text as well. - anyone Set the style="" attributes for tracked elements whenever there's a change in the DOM. plugin called mutant-transition You can use CSS for your transitions and not use hacks. You don't have to write any JavaScript. Just include the JavaScript library and specify which attributes you want to watch in the HTML. You don't have to use fixed height CSS. Set what you want to track on the element in question using data-mutant-attributes="X".
<div data-mutant-attributes="height">
This is an example with mutant-transition
</div>
This uses MutationObserver to follow changes in the DOM. You don't have to set anything up or use JavaScript to manually animate. Changes are tracked automatically. However, because it uses MutationObserver, this will only transition in IE11+. < IE11 will see snap-changes (no transition).
Fiddles
Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
Jake's answer to animate the max-height is great, but I found the delay caused by setting a large max-height annoying.
One could move the collapsable content into an inner div and calculate the max height by getting the height of the inner div (via JQuery it'd be the outerHeight()).
$('button').bind('click', function(e) {
e.preventDefault();
w = $('#outer');
if (w.hasClass('collapsed')) {
w.css({ "max-height": $('#inner').outerHeight() + 'px' });
} else {
w.css({ "max-height": "0px" });
}
w.toggleClass('collapsed');
});
Here's a jsfiddle link: http://jsfiddle.net/pbatey/duZpT
Here's a jsfiddle with the absolute minimal amount of code required: http://jsfiddle.net/8ncjjxh8/
Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
I was able to do this. I have a .child & a .parent div. The child div fits perfectly within the parent's width/height with absolute positioning. I then animate the translate property to push it's Y value down 100%. Its very smooth animation, no glitches or down sides like any other solution here.
Something like this, pseudo code
.parent{ position:relative; overflow:hidden; }
/** shown state */
.child {
position:absolute;top:0;:left:0;right:0;bottom:0;
height: 100%;
transition: transform @overlay-animation-duration ease-in-out;
.translate(0, 0);
}
/** Animate to hidden by sliding down: */
.child.slidedown {
.translate(0, 100%); /** Translate the element "out" the bottom of it's .scene container "mask" so its hidden */
}
You would specify a height on .parent, in px, %, or leave as auto. This div then masks out the .child div when it slides down.
Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
I have not read everything in detail but I have had this problem recently and I did what follows:
div.class{
min-height:1%;
max-height:200px;
-webkit-transition: all 0.5s ease;
-moz-transition: all 0.5s ease;
-o-transition: all 0.5s ease;
-webkit-transition: all 0.5s ease;
transition: all 0.5s ease;
overflow:hidden;
}
div.class:hover{
min-height:100%;
max-height:3000px;
}
This allows you to have a div that at first shows content up to 200px height and on hover it's size becomes at least as high as the whole content of the div. The Div does not become 3000px but 3000px is the limit that I am imposing. Make sure to have the transition on the non :hover, otherwise you might get some strange rendering. In this way the :hover inherits from the non :hover.
Transition does not work form px to % or to auto. You need to use same unit of measure.
Answered 2023-09-20 20:24:00
DEVSNE.VN