What is the most efficient way to deep clone an object in JavaScript?

Asked 2023-09-20 20:01:46 View 384,092

What is the most efficient way to clone a JavaScript object? I've seen obj = eval(uneval(o)); being used, but that's non-standard and only supported by Firefox.

I've done things like obj = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(o)); but question the efficiency.

I've also seen recursive copying functions with various flaws.
I'm surprised no canonical solution exists.

  • Eval is not evil. Using eval poorly is. If you are afraid of its side effects you are using it wrong. The side effects you fear are the reasons to use it. Did any one by the way actually answer your question? - anyone
  • Cloning objects is a tricky business, especially with custom objects of arbitrary collections. Which probably why there is no out-of-the box way to do it. - anyone
  • eval() is generally a bad idea because many Javascript engine's optimisers have to turn off when dealing with variables that are set via eval. Just having eval() in your code can lead to worse performance. - anyone
  • Note that JSON method will loose any Javascript types that have no equivalent in JSON. For example: JSON.parse(JSON.stringify({a:null,b:NaN,c:Infinity,d:undefined,e:function(){},f:Number,g:false})) will generate {a: null, b: null, c: null, g: false} - anyone
  • The react community has introduced immutability-helper - anyone

Answers

Native deep cloning

There's now a JS standard called "structured cloning", that works experimentally in Node 11 and later, will land in browsers, and which has polyfills for existing systems.

structuredClone(value)

If needed, loading the polyfill first:

import structuredClone from '@ungap/structured-clone';

See this answer for more details.

Older answers

Fast cloning with data loss - JSON.parse/stringify

If you do not use Dates, functions, undefined, Infinity, RegExps, Maps, Sets, Blobs, FileLists, ImageDatas, sparse Arrays, Typed Arrays or other complex types within your object, a very simple one liner to deep clone an object is:

JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(object))

const a = {
  string: 'string',
  number: 123,
  bool: false,
  nul: null,
  date: new Date(),  // stringified
  undef: undefined,  // lost
  inf: Infinity,  // forced to 'null'
  re: /.*/,  // lost
}
console.log(a);
console.log(typeof a.date);  // Date object
const clone = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(a));
console.log(clone);
console.log(typeof clone.date);  // result of .toISOString()

See Corban's answer for benchmarks.

Reliable cloning using a library

Since cloning objects is not trivial (complex types, circular references, function etc.), most major libraries provide function to clone objects. Don't reinvent the wheel - if you're already using a library, check if it has an object cloning function. For example,

  • lodash - cloneDeep; can be imported separately via the lodash.clonedeep module and is probably your best choice if you're not already using a library that provides a deep cloning function
  • AngularJS - angular.copy
  • jQuery - jQuery.extend(true, { }, oldObject); .clone() only clones DOM elements
  • just library - just-clone; Part of a library of zero-dependency npm modules that do just do one thing. Guilt-free utilities for every occasion.

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:46

  • Beware! var A = { b: [ { a: [ 1, 2, 3], b: [4, 5, 6], c: [7, 8, 9] } ] }; B = Object.assign( {}, A ); delete B.b[0].b; It will also modify object A ! - anyone
  • @Gabriel Hautclocq this is because A.b or B.b are both referring to the same object in the memory. if A had a property with a non-object value (like numbers or strings), it'll be copied normally. But when a property containing an object value is copied, it is copied by-reference, not by-value. Also, keep in mind that an Array is an object in JS. proof: typeof [] == 'object' && [] instanceof Array - anyone
  • @Unicornist Yes and that's why Object.assign does not answer the question which is: "What is the most efficient way to deep clone an object in JavaScript?". So at least it should NOT be presented as an ES6 solution for deep cloning. The title "ES6" is misleading, at least it should be changed to reflect that this is not a deep cloning method. The "shallow" word is easy to overlook and a lot of people just take the simplest solution they find in Stack Overflow without reading everything. It is dangerous to rely on Object.assign for object cloning. Hence my remark. - anyone
  • I used a library called really fast deep clone: github.com/davidmarkclements/rfdc Worked really well for me. - anyone
  • @Ricardo Surely you can see the history of the answer to see that "(shallow copy)" has been added after "ES6", after I wrote my comment. It's now more clear that this is a shallow copy. - anyone

Checkout this benchmark: http://jsben.ch/#/bWfk9

In my previous tests where speed was a main concern I found

JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj))

to be the slowest way to deep clone an object (it is slower than jQuery.extend with deep flag set true by 10-20%).

jQuery.extend is pretty fast when the deep flag is set to false (shallow clone). It is a good option, because it includes some extra logic for type validation and doesn't copy over undefined properties, etc., but this will also slow you down a little.

If you know the structure of the objects you are trying to clone or can avoid deep nested arrays you can write a simple for (var i in obj) loop to clone your object while checking hasOwnProperty and it will be much much faster than jQuery.

Lastly if you are attempting to clone a known object structure in a hot loop you can get MUCH MUCH MORE PERFORMANCE by simply in-lining the clone procedure and manually constructing the object.

JavaScript trace engines suck at optimizing for..in loops and checking hasOwnProperty will slow you down as well. Manual clone when speed is an absolute must.

var clonedObject = {
  knownProp: obj.knownProp,
  ..
}

Beware using the JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj)) method on Date objects - JSON.stringify(new Date()) returns a string representation of the date in ISO format, which JSON.parse() doesn't convert back to a Date object. See this answer for more details.

Additionally, please note that, in Chrome 65 at least, native cloning is not the way to go. According to JSPerf, performing native cloning by creating a new function is nearly 800x slower than using JSON.stringify which is incredibly fast all the way across the board.

Update for ES6

If you are using Javascript ES6 try this native method for cloning or shallow copy.

Object.assign({}, obj);

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:46

  • Note that there are 2 mistakes in your bench: first, it compares some shallow cloning (lodash _.clone and Object.assign) to some deep cloning (JSON.parse(JSON.stringify())). Secondly, it says "deep clone" for lodash but it does a shallow clone instead. - anyone
  • Note that when testing in the same benchmarking tool, object spread let obj2 = {...obj} appears to be more efficient than Object.assign(). Approximately ~20% faster. - anyone
  • Note, re Object.assign({}, obj} - this is a shallow copy not a deep clone. This means that if a property is itself an object you only get a reference. - anyone
  • +1000 for inline cloning. I had hardcoded in a list of the known properties for my object and was looping over them, which gave me about 3000 copies per millisecond. Once I got rid of the loop and wrote out every property in an object literal, that went up to about 2 million copies per millisecond. Absolutely insane speed gains, I never realized loops were that slow. - anyone

Structured Cloning

2022 update: The structuredClone global function is already available in Firefox 94, Node 17 and Deno 1.14

The HTML standard includes an internal structured cloning/serialization algorithm that can create deep clones of objects. It is still limited to certain built-in types, but in addition to the few types supported by JSON it also supports Dates, RegExps, Maps, Sets, Blobs, FileLists, ImageDatas, sparse Arrays, Typed Arrays, and probably more in the future. It also preserves references within the cloned data, allowing it to support cyclical and recursive structures that would cause errors for JSON.

Support in Node.js:

The structuredClone global function is provided by Node 17.0:

const clone = structuredClone(original);

Previous versions: The v8 module in Node.js (as of Node 11) exposes the structured serialization API directly, but this functionality is still marked as "experimental", and subject to change or removal in future versions. If you're using a compatible version, cloning an object is as simple as:

const v8 = require('v8');

const structuredClone = obj => {
  return v8.deserialize(v8.serialize(obj));
};

Direct Support in Browsers: Available in Firefox 94

The structuredClone global function will soon be provided by all major browsers (having previously been discussed in whatwg/html#793 on GitHub). It looks / will look like this:

const clone = structuredClone(original);

Until this is shipped, browsers' structured clone implementations are only exposed indirectly.

Asynchronous Workaround: Usable. 😕

The lower-overhead way to create a structured clone with existing APIs is to post the data through one port of a MessageChannels. The other port will emit a message event with a structured clone of the attached .data. Unfortunately, listening for these events is necessarily asynchronous, and the synchronous alternatives are less practical.

class StructuredCloner {
  constructor() {
    this.pendingClones_ = new Map();
    this.nextKey_ = 0;
    
    const channel = new MessageChannel();
    this.inPort_ = channel.port1;
    this.outPort_ = channel.port2;
    
    this.outPort_.onmessage = ({data: {key, value}}) => {
      const resolve = this.pendingClones_.get(key);
      resolve(value);
      this.pendingClones_.delete(key);
    };
    this.outPort_.start();
  }

  cloneAsync(value) {
    return new Promise(resolve => {
      const key = this.nextKey_++;
      this.pendingClones_.set(key, resolve);
      this.inPort_.postMessage({key, value});
    });
  }
}

const structuredCloneAsync = window.structuredCloneAsync =
    StructuredCloner.prototype.cloneAsync.bind(new StructuredCloner);

Example Use:

const main = async () => {
  const original = { date: new Date(), number: Math.random() };
  original.self = original;

  const clone = await structuredCloneAsync(original);

  // They're different objects:
  console.assert(original !== clone);
  console.assert(original.date !== clone.date);

  // They're cyclical:
  console.assert(original.self === original);
  console.assert(clone.self === clone);

  // They contain equivalent values:
  console.assert(original.number === clone.number);
  console.assert(Number(original.date) === Number(clone.date));
  
  console.log("Assertions complete.");
};

main();

Synchronous Workarounds: Awful! 🤢

There are no good options for creating structured clones synchronously. Here are a couple of impractical hacks instead.

history.pushState() and history.replaceState() both create a structured clone of their first argument, and assign that value to history.state. You can use this to create a structured clone of any object like this:

const structuredClone = obj => {
  const oldState = history.state;
  history.replaceState(obj, null);
  const clonedObj = history.state;
  history.replaceState(oldState, null);
  return clonedObj;
};

Example Use:

'use strict';

const main = () => {
  const original = { date: new Date(), number: Math.random() };
  original.self = original;

  const clone = structuredClone(original);
  
  // They're different objects:
  console.assert(original !== clone);
  console.assert(original.date !== clone.date);

  // They're cyclical:
  console.assert(original.self === original);
  console.assert(clone.self === clone);

  // They contain equivalent values:
  console.assert(original.number === clone.number);
  console.assert(Number(original.date) === Number(clone.date));
  
  console.log("Assertions complete.");
};

const structuredClone = obj => {
  const oldState = history.state;
  history.replaceState(obj, null);
  const clonedObj = history.state;
  history.replaceState(oldState, null);
  return clonedObj;
};

main();

Though synchronous, this can be extremely slow. It incurs all of the overhead associated with manipulating the browser history. Calling this method repeatedly can cause Chrome to become temporarily unresponsive.

The Notification constructor creates a structured clone of its associated data. It also attempts to display a browser notification to the user, but this will silently fail unless you have requested notification permission. In case you have the permission for other purposes, we'll immediately close the notification we've created.

const structuredClone = obj => {
  const n = new Notification('', {data: obj, silent: true});
  n.onshow = n.close.bind(n);
  return n.data;
};

Example Use:

'use strict';

const main = () => {
  const original = { date: new Date(), number: Math.random() };
  original.self = original;

  const clone = structuredClone(original);
  
  // They're different objects:
  console.assert(original !== clone);
  console.assert(original.date !== clone.date);

  // They're cyclical:
  console.assert(original.self === original);
  console.assert(clone.self === clone);

  // They contain equivalent values:
  console.assert(original.number === clone.number);
  console.assert(Number(original.date) === Number(clone.date));
  
  console.log("Assertions complete.");
};

const structuredClone = obj => {
  const n = new Notification('', {data: obj, silent: true});
  n.close();
  return n.data;
};

main();

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:46

  • This is just so wrong! That API is not meant to be used this way. - anyone
  • As the guy who implemented pushState in Firefox, I feel an odd mix of pride and revulsion at this hack. Well done, guys. - anyone
  • pushState or Notification hack does not work for some object types like Function - anyone
  • April 2022 update: structuredClone is available in FF 94+, Chrome 98+ and Safari 15.4+ and Edge 98+, so in all current versions of the major browsers! - anyone
  • Abuse of API like the above (no offense at @Jeremy's valiant attempts to show solutions) will continue as long as HTML authoring committees are fundamentally unable to design APIs of quality and continue churning out APIs that are broken-by-design. For instance, the structured clone algorithm defines a procedure that is rigid (hardly extendible by a script, say) and at the same time leaves too much to the user agent. Firefox, f.e., is unable to clone Error objects, for instance -- but MDN proudly states it supports structuredClone and friends, although this is a manner of interpretation. - anyone

Assuming that you have only properties and not any functions in your object, you can just use:

var newObject = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(oldObject));

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:46

  • functions and dates as well - anyone
  • Fails for objects with Circular properties - anyone
  • or Sets or other non-JSON-serializable properties - anyone
  • IMHO I think this is the best way to clone a data object. Especially when u are dealing with data fetched from an API and state management. I believe that if you need to clone an object that was created with native Javascript constructs (functions, dates, NaN...) there is something wrong or most probably you do not need to clone it. - anyone
  • This is inefficient for types like NaN, Infinity, undefined etc. JSON.stringify converts them to null. Reference: JSON.parse(JSON.stringify({a:null,b:undefined})) equals {a: null}. - anyone

If there wasn't any builtin one, you could try:

function clone(obj) {
    if (obj === null || typeof (obj) !== 'object' || 'isActiveClone' in obj)
        return obj;

    if (obj instanceof Date)
        var temp = new obj.constructor(); //or new Date(obj);
    else
        var temp = obj.constructor();

    for (var key in obj) {
        if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(obj, key)) {
            obj['isActiveClone'] = null;
            temp[key] = clone(obj[key]);
            delete obj['isActiveClone'];
        }
    }
    return temp;
}

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:46

  • Can you explain isActiveClone part a bit? - anyone
  • It seems to track circular references. E.g.: const a = {}; a['selfref'] = a; a['text'] = 'something'; alert(a.selfref.text); If you tried to clone the above a object without the isActiveClone part, you'd end up in an infinite recursion (because of the recursive clone() call on property selfref). - anyone
  • One the best answers here that handle Arrays and Cyclic References as well as clean code with acceptable speed (performance) - anyone

The efficient way to clone(not deep-clone) an object in one line of code

An Object.assign method is part of the ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) standard and does exactly what you need.

var clone = Object.assign({}, obj);

The Object.assign() method is used to copy the values of all enumerable own properties from one or more source objects to a target object.

Read more...

The polyfill to support older browsers:

if (!Object.assign) {
  Object.defineProperty(Object, 'assign', {
    enumerable: false,
    configurable: true,
    writable: true,
    value: function(target) {
      'use strict';
      if (target === undefined || target === null) {
        throw new TypeError('Cannot convert first argument to object');
      }

      var to = Object(target);
      for (var i = 1; i < arguments.length; i++) {
        var nextSource = arguments[i];
        if (nextSource === undefined || nextSource === null) {
          continue;
        }
        nextSource = Object(nextSource);

        var keysArray = Object.keys(nextSource);
        for (var nextIndex = 0, len = keysArray.length; nextIndex < len; nextIndex++) {
          var nextKey = keysArray[nextIndex];
          var desc = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(nextSource, nextKey);
          if (desc !== undefined && desc.enumerable) {
            to[nextKey] = nextSource[nextKey];
          }
        }
      }
      return to;
    }
  });
}

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:46

  • This doesn't recursively copy so doesn't really offer a solution to the problem of cloning an object. - anyone
  • This method worked, although I tested a few and _.extend({}, (obj)) was BY FAR the fastest: 20x faster than JSON.parse and 60% faster than Object.assign, for example. It copies all sub-objects quite well. - anyone
  • @mwhite there is a difference between clone and deep-clone. This answer does in fact clone, but it doesn't deep-clone. - anyone
  • the question was about recursive copies. Object.assign, as well as the given custom assign, do not copy recursively - anyone
  • This answer isn't a deep-clone and isn't what the question is about. - anyone

Deep copy by performance:

Ranked from best to worst, based on benchmarks
https://www.measurethat.net/Benchmarks/Show/17502/0/deep-copy-comparison

  • spread operator ... (primitive arrays - only)
  • slice() (primitive arrays - only)
  • splice(0) (primitive arrays - only)
  • concat() (primitive arrays - only)
  • JSON.parse(JSON.stringify()) (primitive and literal arrays - only)
  • custom function, as seen below (any array)
  • Lodash's _.cloneDeep() (any array)
  • jQuery's $.extend() (any array)
  • Underscore's _.clone() (primitive and literal arrays - only)

Where:

  • primitives = strings, numbers, and booleans
  • literals = object literals {}, array literals []
  • any = primitives, literals, and prototypes

Deep copy an array of primitives:

let arr1a = [1, 'a', true];

To deep copy arrays with primitives only (i.e. numbers, strings, and booleans), reassignment, slice(), concat(), and Underscore's clone() can be used.

Where spread has the fastest performance:

let arr1b = [...arr1a];

And where slice() has better performance than splice(0) and concat()

let arr1d = arr1a.slice();
let arr1c = arr1a.splice(0);
let arr1e = arr1a.concat();

Deep copy an array of primitive and object literals:

let arr2a = [1, 'a', true, {}, []];
let arr2b = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(arr2a));

Deep copy an array of primitive, object literals, and prototypes:

let arr3a = [1, 'a', true, {}, [], new Object()];

Write a custom function (has faster performance than jQuery $.extend()):

function copy(aObject) {
  // Prevent undefined objects
  // if (!aObject) return aObject;

  let bObject = Array.isArray(aObject) ? [] : {};

  let value;
  for (const key in aObject) {

    // Prevent self-references to parent object
    // if (Object.is(aObject[key], aObject)) continue;
    
    value = aObject[key];

    bObject[key] = (typeof value === "object") ? copy(value) : value;
  }

  return bObject;
}

let arr3b = copy(arr3a);

Or use third-party utility functions:

let arr3c = $.extend(true, [], arr3a); // jQuery
let arr3d = _.cloneDeep(arr3a); // Lodash

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:46

  • With for-in loop you should use hasOwnProperty to exclude inherited properties. I use (possibly even faster) plain for loop over Object.keys. - anyone
  • In a deep copy, wouldn't you want to copy the inherited properties as well? Also, note that invoking the hasOwnProperty method, creates a performance hit (pushing the function call on and off the stack, and executing the method code) for every key. - anyone
  • Most of these are not deep clones at all, and therefore doesn't make sense to benchmark them against eachother. - anyone
  • in my tests, the slice() is very faster than splice(0), although both of them are shallow copy - anyone
  • @S.Serpooshan - In agreement, answer has been updated based on the following benchmarks (measurethat.net/Benchmarks/Show/17502/0/deep-copy-comparison) - anyone

This is what I'm using:

function cloneObject(obj) {
    var clone = {};
    for(var i in obj) {
        if(typeof(obj[i])=="object" && obj[i] != null)
            clone[i] = cloneObject(obj[i]);
        else
            clone[i] = obj[i];
    }
    return clone;
}

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:46

  • Trying: var a = {b: 1, c: 3, d: { a: 10, g: 20, h: { today: new Date() }}}; Not working for me. But Object.assign({}, a) did. - anyone
  • Worse, try let o = {}; o.o = o; cloneObject(o); - anyone
  • Note: This will not work with Dates - anyone
  • This does not work for arrays, as it will turn them into objects: { a: ["foo", "bar"} } will become { a { "0": "foo", "1": "bar" } }. - anyone
  • I have extended this function for complex object but right now it won't support Date stackblitz.com/edit/typescript-vudfgn?file=index.ts - anyone

Code:

// extends 'from' object with members from 'to'. If 'to' is null, a deep clone of 'from' is returned
function extend(from, to)
{
    if (from == null || typeof from != "object") return from;
    if (from.constructor != Object && from.constructor != Array) return from;
    if (from.constructor == Date || from.constructor == RegExp || from.constructor == Function ||
        from.constructor == String || from.constructor == Number || from.constructor == Boolean)
        return new from.constructor(from);

    to = to || new from.constructor();

    for (var name in from)
    {
        to[name] = typeof to[name] == "undefined" ? extend(from[name], null) : to[name];
    }

    return to;
}

Test:

var obj =
{
    date: new Date(),
    func: function(q) { return 1 + q; },
    num: 123,
    text: "asdasd",
    array: [1, "asd"],
    regex: new RegExp(/aaa/i),
    subobj:
    {
        num: 234,
        text: "asdsaD"
    }
}

var clone = extend(obj);

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:46

  • I don't this handles circular structures - anyone

Deep copying objects in JavaScript (I think the best and the simplest)

1. Using JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(object));

var obj = { 
  a: 1,
  b: { 
    c: 2
  }
}
var newObj = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj));
obj.b.c = 20;
console.log(obj); // { a: 1, b: { c: 20 } }
console.log(newObj); // { a: 1, b: { c: 2 } } 

2.Using created method

function cloneObject(obj) {
    var clone = {};
    for(var i in obj) {
        if(obj[i] != null &&  typeof(obj[i])=="object")
            clone[i] = cloneObject(obj[i]);
        else
            clone[i] = obj[i];
    }
    return clone;
}

var obj = { 
  a: 1,
  b: { 
    c: 2
  }
}
var newObj = cloneObject(obj);
obj.b.c = 20;

console.log(obj); // { a: 1, b: { c: 20 } }
console.log(newObj); // { a: 1, b: { c: 2 } } 

3. Using Lo-Dash's _.cloneDeep link lodash

var obj = { 
  a: 1,
  b: { 
    c: 2
  }
}

var newObj = _.cloneDeep(obj);
obj.b.c = 20;
console.log(obj); // { a: 1, b: { c: 20 } }
console.log(newObj); // { a: 1, b: { c: 2 } } 

4. Using Object.assign() method

var obj = { 
  a: 1,
  b: 2
}

var newObj = _.clone(obj);
obj.b = 20;
console.log(obj); // { a: 1, b: 20 }
console.log(newObj); // { a: 1, b: 2 }  

BUT WRONG WHEN

var obj = { 
  a: 1,
  b: { 
    c: 2
  }
}

var newObj = Object.assign({}, obj);
obj.b.c = 20;
console.log(obj); // { a: 1, b: { c: 20 } }
console.log(newObj); // { a: 1, b: { c: 20 } } --> WRONG
// Note: Properties on the prototype chain and non-enumerable properties cannot be copied.

5.Using Underscore.js _.clone link Underscore.js

var obj = { 
  a: 1,
  b: 2
}

var newObj = _.clone(obj);
obj.b = 20;
console.log(obj); // { a: 1, b: 20 }
console.log(newObj); // { a: 1, b: 2 }  

BUT WRONG WHEN

var obj = { 
  a: 1,
  b: { 
    c: 2
  }
}

var newObj = _.cloneDeep(obj);
obj.b.c = 20;
console.log(obj); // { a: 1, b: { c: 20 } }
console.log(newObj); // { a: 1, b: { c: 20 } } --> WRONG
// (Create a shallow-copied clone of the provided plain object. Any nested objects or arrays will be copied by reference, not duplicated.)

JSBEN.CH Performance Benchmarking Playground 1~3 http://jsben.ch/KVQLd Performance Deep copying objects in JavaScript

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:46

  • Hey, your last example is wrong. In my opinion, you must use _clone and not _cloneDeep for the wrong example. - anyone
  • This created method (2.) won't work for arrays, will it? - anyone
  • Method #2 is vulnerable to prototype pollution, similar to what happened to lodash's defaultsDeep. It should not copy if (i === '__proto__'), and it should not copy if (i === 'constuctor' && typeof obj[i] === 'function'). - anyone

Cloning an object was always a concern in JS, but it was all about before ES6, I list different ways of copying an object in JavaScript below, imagine you have the Object below and would like to have a deep copy of that:

var obj = {a:1, b:2, c:3, d:4};

There are few ways to copy this object, without changing the origin:

  1. ES5+, Using a simple function to do the copy for you:

    function deepCopyObj(obj) {
        if (null == obj || "object" != typeof obj) return obj;
        if (obj instanceof Date) {
            var copy = new Date();
            copy.setTime(obj.getTime());
            return copy;
        }
        if (obj instanceof Array) {
            var copy = [];
            for (var i = 0, len = obj.length; i < len; i++) {
                copy[i] = deepCopyObj(obj[i]);
            }
            return copy;
        }
        if (obj instanceof Object) {
            var copy = {};
            for (var attr in obj) {
                if (obj.hasOwnProperty(attr)) copy[attr] = deepCopyObj(obj[attr]);
            }
            return copy;
        }
        throw new Error("Unable to copy obj this object.");
    }
    
  2. ES5+, using JSON.parse and JSON.stringify.

    var deepCopyObj = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj));
    
  3. Angular:

    var deepCopyObj = angular.copy(obj);
    
  4. jQuery:

    var deepCopyObj = jQuery.extend(true, {}, obj);
    
  5. Underscore.js & Lodash:

    var deepCopyObj = _.cloneDeep(obj); //latest version of Underscore.js makes shallow copy
    

Hope these help…

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:46

var clone = function() {
    var newObj = (this instanceof Array) ? [] : {};
    for (var i in this) {
        if (this[i] && typeof this[i] == "object") {
            newObj[i] = this[i].clone();
        }
        else
        {
            newObj[i] = this[i];
        }
    }
    return newObj;
}; 

Object.defineProperty( Object.prototype, "clone", {value: clone, enumerable: false});

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:46

There’s a library (called “clone”), that does this quite well. It provides the most complete recursive cloning/copying of arbitrary objects that I know of. It also supports circular references, which is not covered by the other answers, yet.

You can find it on npm, too. It can be used for the browser as well as Node.js.

Here is an example on how to use it:

Install it with

npm install clone

or package it with Ender.

ender build clone [...]

You can also download the source code manually.

Then you can use it in your source code.

var clone = require('clone');

var a = { foo: { bar: 'baz' } };  // inital value of a
var b = clone(a);                 // clone a -> b
a.foo.bar = 'foo';                // change a

console.log(a);                   // { foo: { bar: 'foo' } }
console.log(b);                   // { foo: { bar: 'baz' } }

(Disclaimer: I’m the author of the library.)

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:46

I know this is an old post, but I thought this may be of some help to the next person who stumbles along.

As long as you don't assign an object to anything it maintains no reference in memory. So to make an object that you want to share among other objects, you'll have to create a factory like so:

var a = function(){
    return {
        father:'zacharias'
    };
},
b = a(),
c = a();
c.father = 'johndoe';
alert(b.father);

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:46

  • This isn't a deep clone of an existing object, this is just creating a new object. - anyone

If you're using it, the Underscore.js library has a clone method.

var newObject = _.clone(oldObject);

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:46

  • This does a shallow copy, not a deep copy like OP is looking for. - anyone

Here's a version of ConroyP's answer above that works even if the constructor has required parameters:

//If Object.create isn't already defined, we just do the simple shim,
//without the second argument, since that's all we need here
var object_create = Object.create;
if (typeof object_create !== 'function') {
    object_create = function(o) {
        function F() {}
        F.prototype = o;
        return new F();
    };
}

function deepCopy(obj) {
    if(obj == null || typeof(obj) !== 'object'){
        return obj;
    }
    //make sure the returned object has the same prototype as the original
    var ret = object_create(obj.constructor.prototype);
    for(var key in obj){
        ret[key] = deepCopy(obj[key]);
    }
    return ret;
}

This function is also available in my simpleoo library.

Edit:

Here's a more robust version (thanks to Justin McCandless this now supports cyclic references as well):

/**
 * Deep copy an object (make copies of all its object properties, sub-properties, etc.)
 * An improved version of http://keithdevens.com/weblog/archive/2007/Jun/07/javascript.clone
 * that doesn't break if the constructor has required parameters
 * 
 * It also borrows some code from http://stackoverflow.com/a/11621004/560114
 */ 
function deepCopy(src, /* INTERNAL */ _visited, _copiesVisited) {
    if(src === null || typeof(src) !== 'object'){
        return src;
    }

    //Honor native/custom clone methods
    if(typeof src.clone == 'function'){
        return src.clone(true);
    }

    //Special cases:
    //Date
    if(src instanceof Date){
        return new Date(src.getTime());
    }
    //RegExp
    if(src instanceof RegExp){
        return new RegExp(src);
    }
    //DOM Element
    if(src.nodeType && typeof src.cloneNode == 'function'){
        return src.cloneNode(true);
    }

    // Initialize the visited objects arrays if needed.
    // This is used to detect cyclic references.
    if (_visited === undefined){
        _visited = [];
        _copiesVisited = [];
    }

    // Check if this object has already been visited
    var i, len = _visited.length;
    for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
        // If so, get the copy we already made
        if (src === _visited[i]) {
            return _copiesVisited[i];
        }
    }

    //Array
    if (Object.prototype.toString.call(src) == '[object Array]') {
        //[].slice() by itself would soft clone
        var ret = src.slice();

        //add it to the visited array
        _visited.push(src);
        _copiesVisited.push(ret);

        var i = ret.length;
        while (i--) {
            ret[i] = deepCopy(ret[i], _visited, _copiesVisited);
        }
        return ret;
    }

    //If we've reached here, we have a regular object

    //make sure the returned object has the same prototype as the original
    var proto = (Object.getPrototypeOf ? Object.getPrototypeOf(src): src.__proto__);
    if (!proto) {
        proto = src.constructor.prototype; //this line would probably only be reached by very old browsers 
    }
    var dest = object_create(proto);

    //add this object to the visited array
    _visited.push(src);
    _copiesVisited.push(dest);

    for (var key in src) {
        //Note: this does NOT preserve ES5 property attributes like 'writable', 'enumerable', etc.
        //For an example of how this could be modified to do so, see the singleMixin() function
        dest[key] = deepCopy(src[key], _visited, _copiesVisited);
    }
    return dest;
}

//If Object.create isn't already defined, we just do the simple shim,
//without the second argument, since that's all we need here
var object_create = Object.create;
if (typeof object_create !== 'function') {
    object_create = function(o) {
        function F() {}
        F.prototype = o;
        return new F();
    };
}

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:46

The following creates two instances of the same object. I found it and am using it currently. It's simple and easy to use.

var objToCreate = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(cloneThis));

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:46

Crockford suggests (and I prefer) using this function:

function object(o) {
    function F() {}
    F.prototype = o;
    return new F();
}

var newObject = object(oldObject);

It's terse, works as expected and you don't need a library.


EDIT:

This is a polyfill for Object.create, so you also can use this.

var newObject = Object.create(oldObject);

NOTE: If you use some of this, you may have problems with some iteration who use hasOwnProperty. Because, create create new empty object who inherits oldObject. But it is still useful and practical for cloning objects.

For exemple if oldObject.a = 5;

newObject.a; // is 5

but:

oldObject.hasOwnProperty(a); // is true
newObject.hasOwnProperty(a); // is false

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:47

function clone(obj)
 { var clone = {};
   clone.prototype = obj.prototype;
   for (property in obj) clone[property] = obj[property];
   return clone;
 }

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:47

Lodash has a nice _.cloneDeep(value) method:

var objects = [{ 'a': 1 }, { 'b': 2 }];

var deep = _.cloneDeep(objects);
console.log(deep[0] === objects[0]);
// => false

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:47

Shallow copy one-liner (ECMAScript 5th edition):

var origin = { foo : {} };
var copy = Object.keys(origin).reduce(function(c,k){c[k]=origin[k];return c;},{});

console.log(origin, copy);
console.log(origin == copy); // false
console.log(origin.foo == copy.foo); // true

And shallow copy one-liner (ECMAScript 6th edition, 2015):

var origin = { foo : {} };
var copy = Object.assign({}, origin);

console.log(origin, copy);
console.log(origin == copy); // false
console.log(origin.foo == copy.foo); // true

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:47

  • This is a shallow copy and a deep clone like the question asked for. This will not work for nested objects. - anyone

There seems to be no ideal deep clone operator yet for array-like objects. As the code below illustrates, John Resig's jQuery cloner turns arrays with non-numeric properties into objects that are not arrays, and RegDwight's JSON cloner drops the non-numeric properties. The following tests illustrate these points on multiple browsers:

function jQueryClone(obj) {
   return jQuery.extend(true, {}, obj)
}

function JSONClone(obj) {
   return JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj))
}

var arrayLikeObj = [[1, "a", "b"], [2, "b", "a"]];
arrayLikeObj.names = ["m", "n", "o"];
var JSONCopy = JSONClone(arrayLikeObj);
var jQueryCopy = jQueryClone(arrayLikeObj);

alert("Is arrayLikeObj an array instance?" + (arrayLikeObj instanceof Array) +
      "\nIs the jQueryClone an array instance? " + (jQueryCopy instanceof Array) +
      "\nWhat are the arrayLikeObj names? " + arrayLikeObj.names +
      "\nAnd what are the JSONClone names? " + JSONCopy.names)

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:47

I have two good answers depending on whether your objective is to clone a "plain old JavaScript object" or not.

Let's also assume that your intention is to create a complete clone with no prototype references back to the source object. If you're not interested in a complete clone, then you can use many of the Object.clone() routines provided in some of the other answers (Crockford's pattern).

For plain old JavaScript objects, a tried and true good way to clone an object in modern runtimes is quite simply:

var clone = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj));

Note that the source object must be a pure JSON object. This is to say, all of its nested properties must be scalars (like boolean, string, array, object, etc). Any functions or special objects like RegExp or Date will not be cloned.

Is it efficient? Heck yes. We've tried all kinds of cloning methods and this works best. I'm sure some ninja could conjure up a faster method. But I suspect we're talking about marginal gains.

This approach is just simple and easy to implement. Wrap it into a convenience function and if you really need to squeeze out some gain, go for at a later time.

Now, for non-plain JavaScript objects, there isn't a really simple answer. In fact, there can't be because of the dynamic nature of JavaScript functions and inner object state. Deep cloning a JSON structure with functions inside requires you recreate those functions and their inner context. And JavaScript simply doesn't have a standardized way of doing that.

The correct way to do this, once again, is via a convenience method that you declare and reuse within your code. The convenience method can be endowed with some understanding of your own objects so you can make sure to properly recreate the graph within the new object.

We're written our own, but the best general approach I've seen is covered here:

http://davidwalsh.name/javascript-clone

This is the right idea. The author (David Walsh) has commented out the cloning of generalized functions. This is something you might choose to do, depending on your use case.

The main idea is that you need to special handle the instantiation of your functions (or prototypal classes, so to speak) on a per-type basis. Here, he's provided a few examples for RegExp and Date.

Not only is this code brief, but it's also very readable. It's pretty easy to extend.

Is this efficient? Heck yes. Given that the goal is to produce a true deep-copy clone, then you're going to have to walk the members of the source object graph. With this approach, you can tweak exactly which child members to treat and how to manually handle custom types.

So there you go. Two approaches. Both are efficient in my view.

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:47

Just because I didn't see AngularJS mentioned and thought that people might want to know...

angular.copy also provides a method of deep copying objects and arrays.

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:47

  • or it might be used the same way as jQiery extend: angular.extend({},obj); - anyone
  • @Galvani: It should be noted that jQuery.extend and angular.extend are both shallow copies. angular.copy is a deep copy. - anyone

I am late to answer this question, but I have an another way of cloning the object:

function cloneObject(obj) {
    if (obj === null || typeof(obj) !== 'object')
        return obj;
    var temp = obj.constructor(); // changed
    for (var key in obj) {
        if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(obj, key)) {
            obj['isActiveClone'] = null;
            temp[key] = cloneObject(obj[key]);
            delete obj['isActiveClone'];
        }
    }
    return temp;
}

var b = cloneObject({"a":1,"b":2});   // calling

which is much better and faster then:

var a = {"a":1,"b":2};
var b = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(a));  

and

var a = {"a":1,"b":2};

// Deep copy
var newObject = jQuery.extend(true, {}, a);

I have bench-marked the code and you can test the results here:

and sharing the results: enter image description here References: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Object/hasOwnProperty

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:47

  • its funny but when I run your tests it actually shoed me that method 1 is the slowest one - anyone
  • same as me, block 1 is the lowest! - anyone
  • Only solution that worked for me! Had to deep clone an object that contained other objects with function properties. Perfect. - anyone
  • Why do you set obj['isActiveClone'] = null and then delete it? And why don't you call obj.hasOwnProperty(key)? - anyone

Only when you can use ECMAScript 6 or transpilers.

Features:

  • Won't trigger getter/setter while copying.
  • Preserves getter/setter.
  • Preserves prototype informations.
  • Works with both object-literal and functional OO writing styles.

Code:

function clone(target, source){

    for(let key in source){

        // Use getOwnPropertyDescriptor instead of source[key] to prevent from trigering setter/getter.
        let descriptor = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(source, key);
        if(descriptor.value instanceof String){
            target[key] = new String(descriptor.value);
        }
        else if(descriptor.value instanceof Array){
            target[key] = clone([], descriptor.value);
        }
        else if(descriptor.value instanceof Object){
            let prototype = Reflect.getPrototypeOf(descriptor.value);
            let cloneObject = clone({}, descriptor.value);
            Reflect.setPrototypeOf(cloneObject, prototype);
            target[key] = cloneObject;
        }
        else {
            Object.defineProperty(target, key, descriptor);
        }
    }
    let prototype = Reflect.getPrototypeOf(source);
    Reflect.setPrototypeOf(target, prototype);
    return target;
}

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:47

  • Problematic for data types like Date - anyone
  • This will create a reference to the same object instance (not deep-copying it) if used with objects that have a null prototype, since Object.create(null) instanceof Object is false. - anyone

This isn't generally the most efficient solution, but it does what I need. Simple test cases below...

function clone(obj, clones) {
    // Makes a deep copy of 'obj'. Handles cyclic structures by
    // tracking cloned obj's in the 'clones' parameter. Functions 
    // are included, but not cloned. Functions members are cloned.
    var new_obj,
        already_cloned,
        t = typeof obj,
        i = 0,
        l,
        pair; 

    clones = clones || [];

    if (obj === null) {
        return obj;
    }

    if (t === "object" || t === "function") {

        // check to see if we've already cloned obj
        for (i = 0, l = clones.length; i < l; i++) {
            pair = clones[i];
            if (pair[0] === obj) {
                already_cloned = pair[1];
                break;
            }
        }

        if (already_cloned) {
            return already_cloned; 
        } else {
            if (t === "object") { // create new object
                new_obj = new obj.constructor();
            } else { // Just use functions as is
                new_obj = obj;
            }

            clones.push([obj, new_obj]); // keep track of objects we've cloned

            for (key in obj) { // clone object members
                if (obj.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
                    new_obj[key] = clone(obj[key], clones);
                }
            }
        }
    }
    return new_obj || obj;
}

Cyclic array test...

a = []
a.push("b", "c", a)
aa = clone(a)
aa === a //=> false
aa[2] === a //=> false
aa[2] === a[2] //=> false
aa[2] === aa //=> true

Function test...

f = new Function
f.a = a
ff = clone(f)
ff === f //=> true
ff.a === a //=> false

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:47

For the people who want to use the JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj)) version, but without losing the Date objects, you can use the second argument of parse method to convert the strings back to Date:

function clone(obj) {
  var regExp = /^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}T\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2}\.\d{3}Z$/;
  return JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj), function(k, v) {
    if (typeof v === 'string' && regExp.test(v))
      return new Date(v)
    return v;
  })
}

// usage:
var original = {
 a: [1, null, undefined, 0, {a:null}, new Date()],
 b: {
   c(){ return 0 }
 }
}

var cloned = clone(original)

console.log(cloned)

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:47

I disagree with the answer with the greatest votes here. A Recursive Deep Clone is much faster than the JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj)) approach mentioned.

And here's the function for quick reference:

function cloneDeep (o) {
  let newO
  let i

  if (typeof o !== 'object') return o

  if (!o) return o

  if (Object.prototype.toString.apply(o) === '[object Array]') {
    newO = []
    for (i = 0; i < o.length; i += 1) {
      newO[i] = cloneDeep(o[i])
    }
    return newO
  }

  newO = {}
  for (i in o) {
    if (o.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
      newO[i] = cloneDeep(o[i])
    }
  }
  return newO
}

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:47

  • I liked this approach but it doesn't handle dates properly; consider adding something like if(o instanceof Date) return new Date(o.valueOf()); after checking for null ` - anyone
  • Crashes on circular references. - anyone
  • In latest stable Firefox, this is way longer than the other strategies at that Jsben.ch link, by an order of magnitude or more. It beats the others in the wrong direction. - anyone

Here is a comprehensive clone() method that can clone any JavaScript object. It handles almost all the cases:

function clone(src, deep) {

    var toString = Object.prototype.toString;
    if (!src && typeof src != "object") {
        // Any non-object (Boolean, String, Number), null, undefined, NaN
        return src;
    }

    // Honor native/custom clone methods
    if (src.clone && toString.call(src.clone) == "[object Function]") {
        return src.clone(deep);
    }

    // DOM elements
    if (src.nodeType && toString.call(src.cloneNode) == "[object Function]") {
        return src.cloneNode(deep);
    }

    // Date
    if (toString.call(src) == "[object Date]") {
        return new Date(src.getTime());
    }

    // RegExp
    if (toString.call(src) == "[object RegExp]") {
        return new RegExp(src);
    }

    // Function
    if (toString.call(src) == "[object Function]") {

        //Wrap in another method to make sure == is not true;
        //Note: Huge performance issue due to closures, comment this :)
        return (function(){
            src.apply(this, arguments);
        });
    }

    var ret, index;
    //Array
    if (toString.call(src) == "[object Array]") {
        //[].slice(0) would soft clone
        ret = src.slice();
        if (deep) {
            index = ret.length;
            while (index--) {
                ret[index] = clone(ret[index], true);
            }
        }
    }
    //Object
    else {
        ret = src.constructor ? new src.constructor() : {};
        for (var prop in src) {
            ret[prop] = deep
                ? clone(src[prop], true)
                : src[prop];
        }
    }
    return ret;
};

Answered   2023-09-20 20:01:47

  • It converts primitives into wrapper objects, not a good solution in most cases. - anyone
  • @DanubianSailor - I don't think it does...it seems to return primitives right away from the start, and doesn't seem to be doing anything to them that would turn them into wrapper objects as they are returned. - anyone