After an AJAX request, sometimes my application may return an empty object, like:
var a = {};
How can I check whether that's the case?
You can use a for…in loop with an Object.hasOwn
(ECMA 2022+) test to check whether an object has any own properties:
function isEmpty(obj) {
for (const prop in obj) {
if (Object.hasOwn(obj, prop)) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
If you also need to distinguish {}
-like empty objects from other objects with no own properties (e.g. Date
s), you can do various (and unfortunately need-specific) type checks:
function isEmptyObject(value) {
if (value == null) {
// null or undefined
return false;
}
if (typeof value !== 'object') {
// boolean, number, string, function, etc.
return false;
}
const proto = Object.getPrototypeOf(value);
// consider `Object.create(null)`, commonly used as a safe map
// before `Map` support, an empty object as well as `{}`
if (proto !== null && proto !== Object.prototype) {
return false;
}
return isEmpty(value);
}
Note that comparing against Object.prototype
like in this example will fail to recognize cross-realm objects.
Do not use Object.keys(obj).length
. It is O(N) complexity because it creates an array containing all the property names only to get the length of that array. Iterating over the object accomplishes the same goal but is O(1).
For compatibility with JavaScript engines that don’t support ES 2022+, const
can be replaced with var
and Object.hasOwn
with Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call
:
function isEmpty(obj) {
for (var prop in obj) {
if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(obj, prop)) {
return false;
}
}
return true
}
Many popular libraries also provide functions to check for empty objects:
jQuery.isEmptyObject({}); // true
_.isEmpty({}); // true
_.isEmpty({}); // true
Hoek:
Hoek.deepEqual({}, {}); // true
Ext.Object.isEmpty({}); // true
angular.equals({}, {}); // true
R.isEmpty({}); // true
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
Object.keys(new Date()).length === 0
; so this answer can be misleading. - anyone "{}"
: { pirate: undefined }
- anyone {constructor: "foo"}
, Object.assign(Object.create(null), {constructor: Object})
, …. - anyone If ECMAScript 5 support is available, you can use Object.keys()
:
function isEmpty(obj) {
return Object.keys(obj).length === 0;
}
For ES3 and older, there's no easy way to do this. You'll have to loop over the properties explicitly:
function isEmpty(obj) {
for(var prop in obj) {
if(obj.hasOwnProperty(prop))
return false;
}
return true;
}
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
isEmpty()
, so it should return false
if it has a property - anyone function isEmpty(object) { for(var i in object) { return true; } return false; }
got to be corrected after 11 years. Here's the correction: function isEmpty(obj) { return !(() => { for (const i in obj) { return true; } return false; })(); }
- anyone function isObjectEmpty(obj) { for (const i in obj) return false; return true; }
- anyone For those of you who have the same problem but use jQuery, you can use jQuery.isEmptyObject.
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
Today 2023.3.20 I perform tests for chosen solutions on MacOs Monterey 12.1 (M1, 16GB) on Chrome v109, Safari v15.2 and Firefox v110.
for-in
(A, L) are fast or fastest on all browsersJSON.stringify
(B) is slowest on all browsersThere solutions are presented in the snippet below. If you want to run a performance test on your machine, click
Old version of this answer contains tests from 2020 - HERE.
Links to answers: A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O P Q
var log = (s, f) => console.log(`${s} --> {}:${f({})} {k:2}:${f({ k: 2 })}`);
function A(obj) {
for (var i in obj) return false;
return true;
}
function B(obj) {
return JSON.stringify(obj) === "{}";
}
function C(obj) {
return Object.keys(obj).length === 0;
}
function D(obj) {
return Object.entries(obj).length === 0;
}
function E(obj) {
return Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj).length === 0;
}
function F(obj) {
return Object.keys(obj).length === 0 && obj.constructor === Object;
}
function G(obj) {
return typeof obj === "undefined" || !Object.keys(obj)[0];
}
function H(obj) {
return Object.entries(obj).length === 0 && obj.constructor === Object;
}
function I(obj) {
return Object.values(obj).every((val) => typeof val === "undefined");
}
function J(obj) {
for (const key in obj) {
if (hasOwnProperty.call(obj, key)) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
function K(obj) {
var isEmpty = true;
for (keys in obj) {
isEmpty = false;
break;
}
return isEmpty;
}
function L(obj) {
for (var prop in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(prop)) return false;
}
return true;
}
function M(obj) {
if (obj === null || typeof obj !== 'object' ||
Object.prototype.toString.call(obj) === '[object Array]') {
return false
} else {
for (var prop in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(prop)) {
return false
}
}
return JSON.stringify(obj) === JSON.stringify({})
}
}
function N(obj) {
return (
Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj).length === 0 &&
Object.getOwnPropertySymbols(obj).length === 0 &&
Object.getPrototypeOf(obj) === Object.prototype
);
}
function O(obj) {
return !(Object.getOwnPropertyNames !== undefined
? Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj).length !== 0
: (function () {
for (var key in obj) break;
return key !== null && key !== undefined;
})());
}
function P(obj) {
return $.isEmptyObject(obj)
}
function Q(obj) {
return _.isEmpty(obj);
}
log("A", A);
log("B", B);
log("C", C);
log("D", D);
log("E", E);
log("F", F);
log("G", G);
log("H", H);
log("I", I);
log("J", J);
log("K", K);
log("L", L);
log("M", M);
log("N", N);
log("O", O);
log("P", P);
log("Q", Q);
<script
src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.6.4.min.js"
integrity="sha256-oP6HI9z1XaZNBrJURtCoUT5SUnxFr8s3BzRl+cbzUq8="
crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/underscore.js/1.13.6/underscore-min.js" integrity="sha512-2V49R8ndaagCOnwmj8QnbT1Gz/rie17UouD9Re5WxbzRVUGoftCu5IuqqtAM9+UC3fwfHCSJR1hkzNQh/2wdtg==" crossorigin="anonymous" referrerpolicy="no-referrer"></script>
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
obj = {a:1,b:2,c:3}
and for(var i in obj)
is still the fastest jsperf.com/object-empty-ch/2 - anyone (o => { for(let k in o) return false; return true; })(obj)
- anyone Object.values
clearly wins, which confirms my other test result: jsben.ch/a3bT7 . Thank You anyway! I just believe the answer requires editing. - anyone return true
), yet one is 25% slower than the other… which suggests the differences are so minute anyway that it shouldn’t matter, they are going to be dwarfed by the cost of a function call in which they will be inevitably wrapped, by JIT and garbage collection jitter and other noise. - anyone You can use Underscore.js.
_.isEmpty({}); // true
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
_.isEmpty
: npm i lodash.isempty
- anyone if(Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj).length === 0){
//is empty
}
see http://bencollier.net/2011/04/javascript-is-an-object-empty/
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
Object.getOwnPropertyNames(new Date()).length === 0
; so this answer can be misleading. - anyone How about using JSON.stringify? It is almost available in all modern browsers.
function isEmptyObject(obj){
return JSON.stringify(obj) === '{}';
}
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
JSON.stringify(new Error('gotcha')) === '{}'
is true
- anyone There is a simple way if you are on a newer browser.
Object.keys(obj).length === 0
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
keys
property come from? - anyone Object.keys
is a standard method but objects do not have a keys property. So this code will report any object as empty except it accidentally happens to have a property named key
with a value which again as a property named length
which is not zero. Horrible! - anyone Object.keys(new Date()).length === 0
; so this answer can be misleading. - anyone Old question, but just had the issue. Including JQuery is not really a good idea if your only purpose is to check if the object is not empty. Instead, just deep into JQuery's code, and you will get the answer:
function isEmptyObject(obj) {
var name;
for (name in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(name)) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
isEmptyObject({ hasOwnProperty: "where is your god now?" })
- anyone Using Object.keys(obj).length (as suggested above for ECMA 5+) is 10 times slower for empty objects! keep with the old school (for...in) option.
Tested under Node, Chrome, Firefox and IE 9, it becomes evident that for most use cases:
Bottom line performance wise, use:
function isEmpty(obj) {
for (var x in obj) { return false; }
return true;
}
or
function isEmpty(obj) {
for (var x in obj) { if (obj.hasOwnProperty(x)) return false; }
return true;
}
See detailed testing results and test code at Is object empty?
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
Object.keys
is slow, but less code. On a small page, where this is called... maybe 10 times... Will this still be slower considering the additional parsing time of the additional code? - anyone My take:
function isEmpty(obj) {
return Object.keys(obj).length === 0;
}
var a = {
a: 1,
b: 2
}
var b = {}
console.log(isEmpty(a)); // false
console.log(isEmpty(b)); // true
Just, I don't think all browsers implement Object.keys()
currently.
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
Object.keys(new Date()).length === 0
; so this answer can be misleading. - anyone I am using this.
function isObjectEmpty(object) {
var isEmpty = true;
for (keys in object) {
isEmpty = false;
break; // exiting since we found that the object is not empty
}
return isEmpty;
}
Eg:
var myObject = {}; // Object is empty
var isEmpty = isObjectEmpty(myObject); // will return true;
// populating the object
myObject = {"name":"John Smith","Address":"Kochi, Kerala"};
// check if the object is empty
isEmpty = isObjectEmpty(myObject); // will return false;
Update
OR
you can use the jQuery implementation of isEmptyObject
function isEmptyObject(obj) {
var name;
for (name in obj) {
return false;
}
return true;
}
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
for (const keys in object) {
- anyone Just a workaround. Can your server generate some special property in case of no data?
For example:
var a = {empty:true};
Then you can easily check it in your AJAX callback code.
Another way to check it:
if (a.toSource() === "({})") // then 'a' is empty
EDIT: If you use any JSON library (f.e. JSON.js) then you may try JSON.encode() function and test the result against empty value string.
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
toSource()
is non-standard and doesn't work in IE or Opera (and potentially other browsers I didn't check) - anyone toSource
property in section 15.2.4; according to MDC, it was introduced in JS1.3 (i.e. Netscape Navigator 4.06), but it's NOT in ECMA-262, 3rd edition! - anyone toSource()
is a horrible way to do this (as is JSON.encode()
). It needs to build a string representing your entire object to just check if it's empty. There's the overhead of converting things to strings, but moreover it will need to convert a million things if your object has a million properties, while actually just looking at one will let you know that it is not empty. - anyone Object.keys will return an Array, which contains the property names of the object. If the length of the array is 0, then we know that the object is empty.
function isEmpty(obj) {
return Object.keys(obj).length === 0 && obj.constructor === Object;
}
We can also check this using Object.values and Object.entries. This is typically the easiest way to determine if an object is empty.
The for…in statement will loop through the enumerable property of object.
function isEmpty(obj) {
for(var prop in obj) {
if(obj.hasOwnProperty(prop))
return false;
}
return true;
}
In the above code, we will loop through object properties and if an object has at least one property, then it will enter the loop and return false. If the object doesn’t have any properties then it will return true.
#3. Using JSON.stringify If we stringify the object and the result is simply an opening and closing bracket, we know the object is empty.
function isEmptyObject(obj){
return JSON.stringify(obj) === '{}';
}
jQuery.isEmptyObject(obj);
_.isEmpty(obj);
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
function isEmpty(obj) {
for(var i in obj) { return false; }
return true;
}
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
Object
with a method through the prototype chain, because that's enumerable and the for in
statement loops through enumerable properties. - anyone The correct answer is:
function isEmptyObject(obj) {
return (
Object.getPrototypeOf(obj) === Object.prototype &&
Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj).length === 0 &&
Object.getOwnPropertySymbols(obj).length === 0
);
}
This checks that:
Object.prototype
.In other words, the object is indistinguishable from one created with {}
.
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
The following example show how to test if a JavaScript object is empty, if by empty we means has no own properties to it.
The script works on ES6.
const isEmpty = (obj) => {
if (obj === null ||
obj === undefined ||
Array.isArray(obj) ||
typeof obj !== 'object'
) {
return true;
}
return Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj).length === 0;
};
console.clear();
console.log('-----');
console.log(isEmpty('')); // true
console.log(isEmpty(33)); // true
console.log(isEmpty([])); // true
console.log(isEmpty({})); // true
console.log(isEmpty({ length: 0, custom_property: [] })); // false
console.log('-----');
console.log(isEmpty('Hello')); // true
console.log(isEmpty([1, 2, 3])); // true
console.log(isEmpty({ test: 1 })); // false
console.log(isEmpty({ length: 3, custom_property: [1, 2, 3] })); // false
console.log('-----');
console.log(isEmpty(new Date())); // true
console.log(isEmpty(Infinity)); // true
console.log(isEmpty(null)); // true
console.log(isEmpty(undefined)); // true
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
isEmpty([1, 2, 3])
supposed to be true? - anyone jQuery have special function isEmptyObject()
for this case:
jQuery.isEmptyObject({}) // true
jQuery.isEmptyObject({ foo: "bar" }) // false
Read more on http://api.jquery.com/jQuery.isEmptyObject/
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
To really accept ONLY {}
, the best way to do it in Javascript using Lodash is:
_.isEmpty(value) && _.isPlainObject(value)
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
In addition to Thevs answer:
var o = {};
alert($.toJSON(o)=='{}'); // true
var o = {a:1};
alert($.toJSON(o)=='{}'); // false
it's jquery + jquery.json
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
$.isEmptyObject()
, don't waste cycles with non-obvious conversions. - anyone Caveat! Beware of JSON's limitiations.
javascript:
obj={ f:function(){} };
alert( "Beware!! obj is NOT empty!\n\nobj = { f:function(){} }" +
"\n\nJSON.stringify( obj )\n\nreturns\n\n" +
JSON.stringify( obj ) );
displays
Beware!! obj is NOT empty! obj = { f:function(){} } JSON.stringify( obj ) returns {}
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
Pure Vanilla Javascript, and full backward compatibility
function isObjectDefined (Obj) {
if (Obj === null || typeof Obj !== 'object' ||
Object.prototype.toString.call(Obj) === '[object Array]') {
return false
} else {
for (var prop in Obj) {
if (Obj.hasOwnProperty(prop)) {
return true
}
}
return JSON.stringify(Obj) !== JSON.stringify({})
}
}
console.log(isObjectDefined()) // false
console.log(isObjectDefined('')) // false
console.log(isObjectDefined(1)) // false
console.log(isObjectDefined('string')) // false
console.log(isObjectDefined(NaN)) // false
console.log(isObjectDefined(null)) // false
console.log(isObjectDefined({})) // false
console.log(isObjectDefined([])) // false
console.log(isObjectDefined({a: ''})) // true
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
Another alternative is to use is.js (14kB) as opposed to jquery (32kB), lodash (50kB), or underscore (16.4kB). is.js proved to be the fastest library among aforementioned libraries that could be used to determine whether an object is empty.
http://jsperf.com/check-empty-object-using-libraries
Obviously all these libraries are not exactly the same so if you need to easily manipulate the DOM then jquery might still be a good choice or if you need more than just type checking then lodash or underscore might be good. As for is.js, here is the syntax:
var a = {};
is.empty(a); // true
is.empty({"hello": "world"}) // false
Like underscore's and lodash's _.isObject()
, this is not exclusively for objects
but also applies to arrays
and strings
.
Under the hood this library is using Object.getOwnPropertyNames
which is similar to Object.keys
but Object.getOwnPropertyNames
is a more thorough since it will return enumerable and non-enumerable properties as described here.
is.empty = function(value) {
if(is.object(value)){
var num = Object.getOwnPropertyNames(value).length;
if(num === 0 || (num === 1 && is.array(value)) || (num === 2 && is.arguments(value))){
return true;
}
return false;
} else {
return value === '';
}
};
If you don't want to bring in a library (which is understandable) and you know that you are only checking objects (not arrays or strings) then the following function should suit your needs.
function isEmptyObject( obj ) {
return Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj).length === 0;
}
This is only a bit faster than is.js though just because you aren't checking whether it is an object.
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
It's weird that I haven't encountered a solution that compares the object's values as opposed to the existence of any entry (maybe I missed it among the many given solutions).
I would like to cover the case where an object is considered empty if all its values are undefined:
const isObjectEmpty = obj => Object.values(obj).every(val => typeof val === "undefined")
console.log(isObjectEmpty({})) // true
console.log(isObjectEmpty({ foo: undefined, bar: undefined })) // true
console.log(isObjectEmpty({ foo: false, bar: null })) // false
Let's say, for the sake of example, you have a function (paintOnCanvas
) that destructs values from its argument (x
, y
and size
). If all of them are undefined, they are to be left out of the resulting set of options. If not they are not, all of them are included.
function paintOnCanvas ({ brush, x, y, size }) {
const baseOptions = { brush }
const areaOptions = { x, y, size }
const options = isObjectEmpty(areaOptions) ? baseOptions : { ...baseOptions, areaOptions }
// ...
}
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
Best one-liner solution I could find (updated):
isEmpty = obj => !Object.values(obj).filter(e => typeof e !== 'undefined').length;
console.log(isEmpty({})) // true
console.log(isEmpty({a: undefined, b: undefined})) // true
console.log(isEmpty({a: undefined, b: void 1024, c: void 0})) // true
console.log(isEmpty({a: [undefined, undefined]})) // false
console.log(isEmpty({a: 1})) // false
console.log(isEmpty({a: ''})) // false
console.log(isEmpty({a: null, b: undefined})) // false
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
Object.keys().length
was already suggested on this question in 2009. stackoverflow.com/a/679937/2943403 So this posted answer is half flawed and the other half redundant. - anyone IsEmpty Object, unexpectedly lost its meaning i.e.: it's programming semantics, when our famous guru from Yahoo introduced the customized non-enumerable Object properties to ECMA and they got accepted.
[ If you don't like history - feel free to skip right to the working code ]
I'm seeing lots of good answers \ solutions to this question \ problem. However, grabbing the most recent extensions to ECMA Script is not the honest way to go. We used to hold back the Web back in the day to keep Netscape 4.x, and Netscape based pages work and projects alive, which (by the way) were extremely primitive backwards and idiosyncratic, refusing to use new W3C standards and propositions [ which were quite revolutionary for that time and coder friendly ] while now being brutal against our own legacy.
Killing Internet Explorer 11 is plain wrong! Yes, some old warriors that infiltrated Microsoft remaining dormant since the "Cold War" era, agreed to it - for all the wrong reasons. - But that doesn't make it right!
Making use, of a newly introduced method\property in your answers and handing it over as a discovery ("that was always there but we didn't notice it"), rather than a new invention (for what it really is), is somewhat 'green' and harmful. I used to make such mistakes some 20 years ago when I still couldn't tell what's already in there and treated everything I could find a reference for, as a common working solution...
Backward compatibility is important !
We just don't know it yet. That's the reason I got the need to share my 'centuries old' generic solution which remains backward and forward compatible to the unforeseen future.
There were lots of attacks on the in operator but I think the guys doing that have finally come to senses and really started to understand and appreciate a true Dynamic Type Language such as JavaScript and its beautiful nature.
My methods aim to be simple and nuclear and for reasons mentioned above, I don't call it "empty" because the meaning of that word is no longer accurate. Is Enumerable, seems to be the word with the exact meaning.
function isEnum( x ) { for( var p in x )return!0; return!1 };
Some use cases:
isEnum({1:0})
true
isEnum({})
false
isEnum(null)
false
Thanks for reading!
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
Sugar.JS provides extended objects for this purpose. The code is clean and simple:
Make an extended object:
a = Object.extended({})
Check it's size:
a.size()
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
I know this doesn't answer 100% your question, but I have faced similar issues before and here's how I use to solve them:
I have an API that may return an empty object. Because I know what fields to expect from the API, I only check if any of the required fields are present or not.
For example:
API returns {} or {agentID: '1234' (required), address: '1234 lane' (opt),...}
.
In my calling function, I'll only check
if(response.data && response.data.agentID) {
do something with my agentID
} else {
is empty response
}
This way I don't need to use those expensive methods to check if an object is empty. The object will be empty for my calling function if it doesn't have the agentID field.
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
This one line code helps with fallback to older browsers too.
var a = {}; //if empty returns false
(Object.getOwnPropertyNames ? Object.getOwnPropertyNames(a).length !== 0 : (function(){ for(var key in a) break; return !!key })()) //Returns False
var a = {b:2}; //if not empty returns true
(Object.getOwnPropertyNames ? Object.getOwnPropertyNames(a).length !== 0 : (function(){ for(var key in a) break; return !!key })()) //Returns true
Object.getOwnPropertyNames is implemented in ECMA-5. the above line works in older browsers with a fallback function.
Another quick solution is checking the
length
property ofObject.keys
,Object.entries
orObject.values
Knowledge article: Follow this SO post for detailed difference between Object.keys Vs Object.getOwnPropertyNames
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05
We can check with vanilla js with handling null or undefined check also as follows,
function isEmptyObject(obj) {
return !!obj && Object.keys(obj).length === 0 && obj.constructor === Object;
}
//tests
isEmptyObject(new Boolean()); // false
isEmptyObject(new Array()); // false
isEmptyObject(new RegExp()); // false
isEmptyObject(new String()); // false
isEmptyObject(new Number()); // false
isEmptyObject(new Function()); // false
isEmptyObject(new Date()); // false
isEmptyObject(null); // false
isEmptyObject(undefined); // false
isEmptyObject({}); // true
Answered 2023-09-20 20:14:05