How do I test for an empty JavaScript object?

Asked 2023-09-20 20:14:05 View 855,692

After an AJAX request, sometimes my application may return an empty object, like:

var a = {};

How can I check whether that's the case?

Answers

You can use a for…in loop with an Object.hasOwn (ECMA 2022+) test to check whether an object has any own properties:

function isEmpty(obj) {
  for (const prop in obj) {
    if (Object.hasOwn(obj, prop)) {
      return false;
    }
  }

  return true;
}

If you also need to distinguish {}-like empty objects from other objects with no own properties (e.g. Dates), you can do various (and unfortunately need-specific) type checks:

function isEmptyObject(value) {
  if (value == null) {
    // null or undefined
    return false;
  }

  if (typeof value !== 'object') {
    // boolean, number, string, function, etc.
    return false;
  }

  const proto = Object.getPrototypeOf(value);

  // consider `Object.create(null)`, commonly used as a safe map
  // before `Map` support, an empty object as well as `{}`
  if (proto !== null && proto !== Object.prototype) {
    return false;
  }

  return isEmpty(value);
}

Note that comparing against Object.prototype like in this example will fail to recognize cross-realm objects.

Do not use Object.keys(obj).length. It is O(N) complexity because it creates an array containing all the property names only to get the length of that array. Iterating over the object accomplishes the same goal but is O(1).

For compatibility with JavaScript engines that don’t support ES 2022+, const can be replaced with var and Object.hasOwn with Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call:

function isEmpty(obj) {
  for (var prop in obj) {
    if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(obj, prop)) {
      return false;
    }
  }

  return true
}

Many popular libraries also provide functions to check for empty objects:

jQuery:

jQuery.isEmptyObject({}); // true

lodash:

_.isEmpty({}); // true

Underscore:

_.isEmpty({}); // true

Hoek:

Hoek.deepEqual({}, {}); // true

ExtJS:

Ext.Object.isEmpty({}); // true

AngularJS (version 1):

angular.equals({}, {}); // true

Ramda:

R.isEmpty({}); // true

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

  • Object.keys(new Date()).length === 0; so this answer can be misleading. - anyone
  • @Wronski Yes, potentially, and it’s already in the answer. It’s not a very good solution, though (slow, no more reliable and sometimes less). - anyone
  • @Wronski It is insufficient because this following object would also return "{}": { pirate: undefined } - anyone
  • @Chema: Also a wrong way to compare prototypes, e.g. {constructor: "foo"}, Object.assign(Object.create(null), {constructor: Object}), …. - anyone
  • I really wish this answer wasn't selected. Creating a new array, with unknown number of entries, is O(N) complexity, and completely unnecessary. Use the for loop with early exit. - anyone

If ECMAScript 5 support is available, you can use Object.keys():

function isEmpty(obj) {
    return Object.keys(obj).length === 0;
}

For ES3 and older, there's no easy way to do this. You'll have to loop over the properties explicitly:

function isEmpty(obj) {
    for(var prop in obj) {
        if(obj.hasOwnProperty(prop))
            return false;
    }

    return true;
}

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

  • This works fine, or more simply: function isEmpty(object) { for(var i in object) { return true; } return false; } - anyone
  • Shouldnt true and false be reversed in this function? - anyone
  • @namtax: no - the function is named isEmpty(), so it should return false if it has a property - anyone
  • @NicholasKreidberg That code function isEmpty(object) { for(var i in object) { return true; } return false; } got to be corrected after 11 years. Here's the correction: function isEmpty(obj) { return !(() => { for (const i in obj) { return true; } return false; })(); } - anyone
  • Alernatively: function isObjectEmpty(obj) { for (const i in obj) return false; return true; } - anyone

For those of you who have the same problem but use jQuery, you can use jQuery.isEmptyObject.

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

  • This won't work if you (or any plugin) modified Object.prototype. - anyone
  • note that this works fine for the question asked, {}, but that jQuery.isEmptyObject([]) === true, presumably because an empty list is iterable. - anyone
  • Note that jQuery.isEmptyObject returns false when you feed it an empty jQuery object (as noted on its API page). It only works for regular JavaScript objects. - anyone

Performance

Today 2023.3.20 I perform tests for chosen solutions on MacOs Monterey 12.1 (M1, 16GB) on Chrome v109, Safari v15.2 and Firefox v110.

Conclusions

  • Solutions based on for-in (A, L) are fast or fastest on all browsers
  • Solution based on JSON.stringify (B) is slowest on all browsers

enter image description here

Details

There solutions are presented in the snippet below. If you want to run a performance test on your machine, click

  • HERE for empty object
  • HERE for object witch 10 fields
  • HERE for object with 100 fields

Old version of this answer contains tests from 2020 - HERE.

Links to answers: A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O P Q

var log = (s, f) => console.log(`${s} --> {}:${f({})}  {k:2}:${f({ k: 2 })}`);

function A(obj) {
  for (var i in obj) return false;
  return true;
}

function B(obj) {
  return JSON.stringify(obj) === "{}";
}

function C(obj) {
  return Object.keys(obj).length === 0;
}

function D(obj) {
  return Object.entries(obj).length === 0;
}

function E(obj) {
  return Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj).length === 0;
}

function F(obj) {
  return Object.keys(obj).length === 0 && obj.constructor === Object;
}

function G(obj) {
  return typeof obj === "undefined" || !Object.keys(obj)[0];
}

function H(obj) {
  return Object.entries(obj).length === 0 && obj.constructor === Object;
}

function I(obj) {
  return Object.values(obj).every((val) => typeof val === "undefined");
}

function J(obj) {
  for (const key in obj) {
    if (hasOwnProperty.call(obj, key)) {
      return false;
    }
  }
  return true;
}

function K(obj) {
  var isEmpty = true;
  for (keys in obj) {
     isEmpty = false;
     break;
  }
  return isEmpty;
}

function L(obj) {
  for (var prop in obj) {
    if (obj.hasOwnProperty(prop)) return false;
  }
  return true;
}

function M(obj) {
  if (obj === null || typeof obj !== 'object' ||
    Object.prototype.toString.call(obj) === '[object Array]') {
    return false
  } else {
    for (var prop in obj) {
      if (obj.hasOwnProperty(prop)) {
        return false
      }
    }
    return JSON.stringify(obj) === JSON.stringify({})
  }
}

function N(obj) {
  return (
    Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj).length === 0 &&
    Object.getOwnPropertySymbols(obj).length === 0 &&
    Object.getPrototypeOf(obj) === Object.prototype
  );
}

function O(obj) {
  return !(Object.getOwnPropertyNames !== undefined
    ? Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj).length !== 0
    : (function () {
        for (var key in obj) break;
        return key !== null && key !== undefined;
      })());
}

function P(obj) {
  return $.isEmptyObject(obj)
}

function Q(obj) {
  return _.isEmpty(obj);
}

log("A", A);
log("B", B);
log("C", C);
log("D", D);
log("E", E);
log("F", F);
log("G", G);
log("H", H);
log("I", I);
log("J", J);
log("K", K);
log("L", L);
log("M", M);
log("N", N);
log("O", O);
log("P", P);
log("Q", Q);
<script
  src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.6.4.min.js"
  integrity="sha256-oP6HI9z1XaZNBrJURtCoUT5SUnxFr8s3BzRl+cbzUq8="
  crossorigin="anonymous"></script>

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/underscore.js/1.13.6/underscore-min.js" integrity="sha512-2V49R8ndaagCOnwmj8QnbT1Gz/rie17UouD9Re5WxbzRVUGoftCu5IuqqtAM9+UC3fwfHCSJR1hkzNQh/2wdtg==" crossorigin="anonymous" referrerpolicy="no-referrer"></script>

enter image description here

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

  • For completeness, I edited your jsperf to test obj = {a:1,b:2,c:3} and for(var i in obj) is still the fastest jsperf.com/object-empty-ch/2 - anyone
  • @Christian Matthew Okay, (o => { for(let k in o) return false; return true; })(obj) - anyone
  • @ChristianMatthew with the exception of B-E, everything else should go into its own function anyway...they're too verbose otherwise. - anyone
  • I created a fork of the test changing the initial object to contain 10000 elements and the results are really different: jsbench.me/hplcsahs9e/1 . At least in Firefox and Chromium Object.values clearly wins, which confirms my other test result: jsben.ch/a3bT7 . Thank You anyway! I just believe the answer requires editing. - anyone
  • Moronix has better benchmarks than this. Most of those snippets are not remotely equivalent, so it makes little sense to compare them. (K) and (L) are basically the same code, though (with the former missing a return true), yet one is 25% slower than the other… which suggests the differences are so minute anyway that it shouldn’t matter, they are going to be dwarfed by the cost of a function call in which they will be inevitably wrapped, by JIT and garbage collection jitter and other noise. - anyone

You can use Underscore.js.

_.isEmpty({}); // true

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

  • Or you could use lodash is empty (lodash.com/docs#isEmpty), but how is that any different from using a jQuery solution - you still need to install an additional library. I think a vanilla javascript solution is the intent. - anyone
  • If adding the entire dependency is mortifying to your super-performance dependent application, you can install just _.isEmpty: npm i lodash.isempty - anyone
if(Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj).length === 0){
  //is empty
}

see http://bencollier.net/2011/04/javascript-is-an-object-empty/

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

  • This includes non-enumerable properties, in case you care. - anyone
  • The Object.getOwnPropertyNames({}).length is 10 times slower than the (for...in...) option - I suggest to avoid it as a way to test if an objetc is empty. - anyone
  • Object.getOwnPropertyNames(new Date()).length === 0; so this answer can be misleading. - anyone

How about using JSON.stringify? It is almost available in all modern browsers.

function isEmptyObject(obj){
    return JSON.stringify(obj) === '{}';
}

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

  • This is slow and speed matters for this kind of utility. Quick perf test here: jsperf.com/empty-object-test - anyone
  • This is a very slow option - I suggest to use the (for...in) option instead - anyone
  • And it doesn't work for objects that contain functions. - anyone
  • It will also throw an error if there's a circular reference in the object. So it's slow, unreliable and can throw errors and break everything else. No reason to use it ever. - anyone
  • Please note that JSON.stringify(new Error('gotcha')) === '{}' is true - anyone

There is a simple way if you are on a newer browser. Object.keys(obj).length === 0

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

  • Where does the keys property come from? - anyone
  • It's a standard method in ECMAScript 5.1 - anyone
  • How can the above comment have 4 upvotes? Yes, Object.keys is a standard method but objects do not have a keys property. So this code will report any object as empty except it accidentally happens to have a property named key with a value which again as a property named length which is not zero. Horrible! - anyone
  • Object.keys(new Date()).length === 0; so this answer can be misleading. - anyone
  • @scravy Object is the class Object. Object has a static method named 'keys' which accepts an object as an argument. This method returns an array of strings where the strings are property names. developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/… - anyone

Old question, but just had the issue. Including JQuery is not really a good idea if your only purpose is to check if the object is not empty. Instead, just deep into JQuery's code, and you will get the answer:

function isEmptyObject(obj) {
    var name;
    for (name in obj) {
        if (obj.hasOwnProperty(name)) {
            return false;
        }
    }
    return true;
}

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

  • This is only useful if some other process hasn't added a prototype to your base object. To make this truly workable, you need to test for obj.hasOwnProperty(name) - anyone
  • isEmptyObject({ hasOwnProperty: "where is your god now?" }) - anyone

Using Object.keys(obj).length (as suggested above for ECMA 5+) is 10 times slower for empty objects! keep with the old school (for...in) option.

Tested under Node, Chrome, Firefox and IE 9, it becomes evident that for most use cases:

  • (for...in...) is the fastest option to use!
  • Object.keys(obj).length is 10 times slower for empty objects
  • JSON.stringify(obj).length is always the slowest (not suprising)
  • Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj).length takes longer than Object.keys(obj).length can be much longer on some systems.

Bottom line performance wise, use:

function isEmpty(obj) { 
   for (var x in obj) { return false; }
   return true;
}

or

function isEmpty(obj) {
   for (var x in obj) { if (obj.hasOwnProperty(x))  return false; }
   return true;
}

See detailed testing results and test code at Is object empty?

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

  • Object.keys is slow, but less code. On a small page, where this is called... maybe 10 times... Will this still be slower considering the additional parsing time of the additional code? - anyone

My take:

function isEmpty(obj) {
  return Object.keys(obj).length === 0;
}

var a = {
  a: 1,
  b: 2
}
var b = {}

console.log(isEmpty(a)); // false
console.log(isEmpty(b)); // true

Just, I don't think all browsers implement Object.keys() currently.

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

  • Object.keys(new Date()).length === 0; so this answer can be misleading. - anyone
  • Depends if you consider a date being always "full" despite never exposing keys. But I agree that if that's your plan, adding some supplementary instanceof check for Date constructor is a good option. - anyone

I am using this.

function isObjectEmpty(object) {
  var isEmpty = true;
  for (keys in object) {
     isEmpty = false;
     break; // exiting since we found that the object is not empty
  }
  return isEmpty;
}

Eg:

var myObject = {}; // Object is empty
var isEmpty  = isObjectEmpty(myObject); // will return true;
 
// populating the object
myObject = {"name":"John Smith","Address":"Kochi, Kerala"}; 
 
// check if the object is empty
isEmpty  = isObjectEmpty(myObject); // will return false;

from here

Update

OR

you can use the jQuery implementation of isEmptyObject

function isEmptyObject(obj) {
  var name;
  for (name in obj) {
    return false;
  }
  return true;
}

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

  • hi. when you test this function with number or boolean true or false return true and this is not correct result. isObjectEmpty(true). isObjectEmpty(false). isObjectEmpty(1) - anyone
  • We are checking whether the object is empty, not if the data type is an object. In your case to check if its an object we need to something like if(typeof a === "object") {...} - anyone
  • on react I get keys is not defined - anyone
  • @NineCattoRules Try for (const keys in object) { - anyone
  1. Just a workaround. Can your server generate some special property in case of no data?

    For example:

    var a = {empty:true};
    

    Then you can easily check it in your AJAX callback code.

  2. Another way to check it:

    if (a.toSource() === "({})")  // then 'a' is empty
    

EDIT: If you use any JSON library (f.e. JSON.js) then you may try JSON.encode() function and test the result against empty value string.

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

  • toSource() is non-standard and doesn't work in IE or Opera (and potentially other browsers I didn't check) - anyone
  • @Thevs: perhaps you have a different copy of the current version of ECMA-262, but mine does not list a toSource property in section 15.2.4; according to MDC, it was introduced in JS1.3 (i.e. Netscape Navigator 4.06), but it's NOT in ECMA-262, 3rd edition! - anyone
  • @Thevs: well, at least 2 important browser vendors didn't implement it, so it's hardly a de-facto-standard, and as it's not in ECMA-262, it's not a real one either... - anyone
  • Even when it does work, toSource() is a horrible way to do this (as is JSON.encode()). It needs to build a string representing your entire object to just check if it's empty. There's the overhead of converting things to strings, but moreover it will need to convert a million things if your object has a million properties, while actually just looking at one will let you know that it is not empty. - anyone
  • @Thevs the overhead is bigger, even if it might be (I'm not sure it is under every circumstance) in the same order of magnitude. However, that answer involves returning false as soon as a different property is found which makes the story is different all together... - anyone

1. Using Object.keys

Object.keys will return an Array, which contains the property names of the object. If the length of the array is 0, then we know that the object is empty.

function isEmpty(obj) {
    return Object.keys(obj).length === 0 && obj.constructor === Object;
}

We can also check this using Object.values and Object.entries. This is typically the easiest way to determine if an object is empty.

2. Looping over object properties with for…in

The for…in statement will loop through the enumerable property of object.

function isEmpty(obj) {
    for(var prop in obj) {
        if(obj.hasOwnProperty(prop))
            return false;
    }

    return true;
}

In the above code, we will loop through object properties and if an object has at least one property, then it will enter the loop and return false. If the object doesn’t have any properties then it will return true.

#3. Using JSON.stringify If we stringify the object and the result is simply an opening and closing bracket, we know the object is empty.

function isEmptyObject(obj){
    return JSON.stringify(obj) === '{}';
}

4. Using jQuery

jQuery.isEmptyObject(obj); 

5. Using Underscore and Lodash

_.isEmpty(obj);

Resource

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

  • What does it mean : && obj.constructor === Object? - anyone
function isEmpty(obj) {
  for(var i in obj) { return false; }
  return true;
}

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

  • That'll report also true, when, for instance, a JavaScript library extends Object with a method through the prototype chain, because that's enumerable and the for in statement loops through enumerable properties. - anyone

The correct answer is:

function isEmptyObject(obj) {
  return (
    Object.getPrototypeOf(obj) === Object.prototype &&
    Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj).length === 0 &&
    Object.getOwnPropertySymbols(obj).length === 0
  );
}

This checks that:

  • The object's prototype is exactly Object.prototype.
  • The object has no own properties (regardless of enumerability).
  • The object has no own property symbols.

In other words, the object is indistinguishable from one created with {}.

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

The following example show how to test if a JavaScript object is empty, if by empty we means has no own properties to it.

The script works on ES6.

const isEmpty = (obj) => {
    if (obj === null ||
        obj === undefined ||
        Array.isArray(obj) ||
        typeof obj !== 'object'
    ) {
        return true;
    }
    return Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj).length === 0;
};
console.clear();
console.log('-----');
console.log(isEmpty(''));           // true
console.log(isEmpty(33));           // true
console.log(isEmpty([]));           // true
console.log(isEmpty({}));           // true
console.log(isEmpty({ length: 0, custom_property: [] })); // false
console.log('-----');
console.log(isEmpty('Hello'));      // true
console.log(isEmpty([1, 2, 3]));    // true
console.log(isEmpty({ test: 1 }));  // false
console.log(isEmpty({ length: 3, custom_property: [1, 2, 3] })); // false
console.log('-----');
console.log(isEmpty(new Date()));   // true
console.log(isEmpty(Infinity));     // true
console.log(isEmpty(null));         // true
console.log(isEmpty(undefined));    // true

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

  • Why exactly is isEmpty([1, 2, 3]) supposed to be true? - anyone

jQuery have special function isEmptyObject() for this case:

jQuery.isEmptyObject({}) // true
jQuery.isEmptyObject({ foo: "bar" }) // false

Read more on http://api.jquery.com/jQuery.isEmptyObject/

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

To really accept ONLY {}, the best way to do it in Javascript using Lodash is:

_.isEmpty(value) && _.isPlainObject(value)

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

In addition to Thevs answer:

var o = {};
alert($.toJSON(o)=='{}'); // true

var o = {a:1};
alert($.toJSON(o)=='{}'); // false

it's jquery + jquery.json

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

  • I don't like using JSON because it can't work with circular object structures. - anyone
  • If your page loads jQuery then use $.isEmptyObject(), don't waste cycles with non-obvious conversions. - anyone

Caveat! Beware of JSON's limitiations.

javascript:
  obj={  f:function(){}  };
  alert( "Beware!! obj is NOT empty!\n\nobj = {  f:function(){}  }" + 
               "\n\nJSON.stringify( obj )\n\nreturns\n\n" +
                        JSON.stringify( obj ) );

displays

    Beware!! obj is NOT empty!

    obj = {  f:function(){}  }

    JSON.stringify( obj )

    returns

    {}

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

Pure Vanilla Javascript, and full backward compatibility

function isObjectDefined (Obj) {
  if (Obj === null || typeof Obj !== 'object' ||
    Object.prototype.toString.call(Obj) === '[object Array]') {
    return false
  } else {
    for (var prop in Obj) {
      if (Obj.hasOwnProperty(prop)) {
        return true
      }
    }
    return JSON.stringify(Obj) !== JSON.stringify({})
  }
}

console.log(isObjectDefined()) // false
console.log(isObjectDefined('')) // false
console.log(isObjectDefined(1)) // false
console.log(isObjectDefined('string')) // false
console.log(isObjectDefined(NaN)) // false
console.log(isObjectDefined(null)) // false
console.log(isObjectDefined({})) // false
console.log(isObjectDefined([])) // false
console.log(isObjectDefined({a: ''})) // true

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

Another alternative is to use is.js (14kB) as opposed to jquery (32kB), lodash (50kB), or underscore (16.4kB). is.js proved to be the fastest library among aforementioned libraries that could be used to determine whether an object is empty.

http://jsperf.com/check-empty-object-using-libraries

Obviously all these libraries are not exactly the same so if you need to easily manipulate the DOM then jquery might still be a good choice or if you need more than just type checking then lodash or underscore might be good. As for is.js, here is the syntax:

var a = {};
is.empty(a); // true
is.empty({"hello": "world"}) // false

Like underscore's and lodash's _.isObject(), this is not exclusively for objects but also applies to arrays and strings.

Under the hood this library is using Object.getOwnPropertyNames which is similar to Object.keys but Object.getOwnPropertyNames is a more thorough since it will return enumerable and non-enumerable properties as described here.

is.empty = function(value) {
    if(is.object(value)){
        var num = Object.getOwnPropertyNames(value).length;
        if(num === 0 || (num === 1 && is.array(value)) || (num === 2 && is.arguments(value))){
            return true;
        }
        return false;
    } else {
        return value === '';
    }
};

If you don't want to bring in a library (which is understandable) and you know that you are only checking objects (not arrays or strings) then the following function should suit your needs.

function isEmptyObject( obj ) {
    return Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj).length === 0;
}

This is only a bit faster than is.js though just because you aren't checking whether it is an object.

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

It's weird that I haven't encountered a solution that compares the object's values as opposed to the existence of any entry (maybe I missed it among the many given solutions).
I would like to cover the case where an object is considered empty if all its values are undefined:

    const isObjectEmpty = obj => Object.values(obj).every(val => typeof val === "undefined")

    console.log(isObjectEmpty({}))                                 // true
    console.log(isObjectEmpty({ foo: undefined, bar: undefined })) // true
    console.log(isObjectEmpty({ foo: false,     bar: null }))      // false

Example usage

Let's say, for the sake of example, you have a function (paintOnCanvas) that destructs values from its argument (x, y and size). If all of them are undefined, they are to be left out of the resulting set of options. If not they are not, all of them are included.

function paintOnCanvas ({ brush, x, y, size }) {
  const baseOptions = { brush }
  const areaOptions = { x, y, size }
  const options = isObjectEmpty(areaOptions) ? baseOptions : { ...baseOptions, areaOptions }
  // ...
}

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

Best one-liner solution I could find (updated):

isEmpty = obj => !Object.values(obj).filter(e => typeof e !== 'undefined').length;

console.log(isEmpty({}))                                        // true
console.log(isEmpty({a: undefined, b: undefined}))              // true
console.log(isEmpty({a: undefined, b: void 1024, c: void 0}))   // true

console.log(isEmpty({a: [undefined, undefined]}))               // false
console.log(isEmpty({a: 1}))                                    // false
console.log(isEmpty({a: ''}))                                   // false
console.log(isEmpty({a: null, b: undefined}))                   // false

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

  • Greatest answer overlooked - anyone
  • @Damien, tbf the question is 11 years old & this answer was posted 2 weeks ago. - anyone
  • What if the object is like this: { 0 : null }, I am getting a key whose value is null. What to do in such cases? - anyone
  • Checking Object.keys().length was already suggested on this question in 2009. stackoverflow.com/a/679937/2943403 So this posted answer is half flawed and the other half redundant. - anyone

IsEmpty Object, unexpectedly lost its meaning i.e.: it's programming semantics, when our famous guru from Yahoo introduced the customized non-enumerable Object properties to ECMA and they got accepted.

[ If you don't like history - feel free to skip right to the working code ]

I'm seeing lots of good answers \ solutions to this question \ problem. However, grabbing the most recent extensions to ECMA Script is not the honest way to go. We used to hold back the Web back in the day to keep Netscape 4.x, and Netscape based pages work and projects alive, which (by the way) were extremely primitive backwards and idiosyncratic, refusing to use new W3C standards and propositions [ which were quite revolutionary for that time and coder friendly ] while now being brutal against our own legacy.

Killing Internet Explorer 11 is plain wrong! Yes, some old warriors that infiltrated Microsoft remaining dormant since the "Cold War" era, agreed to it - for all the wrong reasons. - But that doesn't make it right!

Making use, of a newly introduced method\property in your answers and handing it over as a discovery ("that was always there but we didn't notice it"), rather than a new invention (for what it really is), is somewhat 'green' and harmful. I used to make such mistakes some 20 years ago when I still couldn't tell what's already in there and treated everything I could find a reference for, as a common working solution...

Backward compatibility is important !

We just don't know it yet. That's the reason I got the need to share my 'centuries old' generic solution which remains backward and forward compatible to the unforeseen future.

There were lots of attacks on the in operator but I think the guys doing that have finally come to senses and really started to understand and appreciate a true Dynamic Type Language such as JavaScript and its beautiful nature.

My methods aim to be simple and nuclear and for reasons mentioned above, I don't call it "empty" because the meaning of that word is no longer accurate. Is Enumerable, seems to be the word with the exact meaning.

function isEnum( x ) { for( var p in x )return!0; return!1 };

Some use cases:

isEnum({1:0})
true

isEnum({})
false

isEnum(null)
false

Thanks for reading!

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

Sugar.JS provides extended objects for this purpose. The code is clean and simple:

Make an extended object:

a = Object.extended({})

Check it's size:

a.size()

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

I know this doesn't answer 100% your question, but I have faced similar issues before and here's how I use to solve them:

I have an API that may return an empty object. Because I know what fields to expect from the API, I only check if any of the required fields are present or not.

For example:

API returns {} or {agentID: '1234' (required), address: '1234 lane' (opt),...}. In my calling function, I'll only check

if(response.data && response.data.agentID) { 
  do something with my agentID 
} else { 
  is empty response
}

This way I don't need to use those expensive methods to check if an object is empty. The object will be empty for my calling function if it doesn't have the agentID field.

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

This one line code helps with fallback to older browsers too.

var a = {}; //if empty returns false
(Object.getOwnPropertyNames ? Object.getOwnPropertyNames(a).length !== 0 : (function(){ for(var key in a) break; return !!key })()) //Returns False

var a = {b:2}; //if not empty returns true
(Object.getOwnPropertyNames ? Object.getOwnPropertyNames(a).length !== 0 : (function(){ for(var key in a) break; return !!key })()) //Returns true

Object.getOwnPropertyNames is implemented in ECMA-5. the above line works in older browsers with a fallback function.


Another quick solution is checking the length property of Object.keys, Object.entries or Object.values

Knowledge article: Follow this SO post for detailed difference between Object.keys Vs Object.getOwnPropertyNames

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05

We can check with vanilla js with handling null or undefined check also as follows,

function isEmptyObject(obj) {
  return !!obj && Object.keys(obj).length === 0 && obj.constructor === Object;
}

//tests

isEmptyObject(new Boolean());  // false 
isEmptyObject(new Array());    // false 
isEmptyObject(new RegExp());   // false 
isEmptyObject(new String());   // false 
isEmptyObject(new Number());   // false 
isEmptyObject(new Function()); // false 
isEmptyObject(new Date());     // false
isEmptyObject(null);          // false
isEmptyObject(undefined);     // false
isEmptyObject({});            // true

Answered   2023-09-20 20:14:05