Calling the base constructor in C#

Modify your constructor to the following so that it calls the base class constructor properly:

public class MyExceptionClass : Exception
{
    public MyExceptionClass(string message, string extrainfo) : base(message)
    {
        //other stuff here
    }
}

Note that a constructor is not something that you can call anytime within a method. That's the reason you're getting errors in your call in the constructor body.

Note that you can use static methods within the call to the base constructor.

class MyExceptionClass : Exception
{
     public MyExceptionClass(string message, string extraInfo) : 
         base(ModifyMessage(message, extraInfo))
     {
     }

     private static string ModifyMessage(string message, string extraInfo)
     {
         Trace.WriteLine("message was " + message);
         return message.ToLowerInvariant() + Environment.NewLine + extraInfo;
     }
}

If you need to call the base constructor but not right away because your new (derived) class needs to do some data manipulation, the best solution is to resort to factory method. What you need to do is to mark private your derived constructor, then make a static method in your class that will do all the necessary stuff and later call the constructor and return the object.

public class MyClass : BaseClass
{
    private MyClass(string someString) : base(someString)
    {
        //your code goes in here
    }

    public static MyClass FactoryMethod(string someString)
    {
        //whatever you want to do with your string before passing it in
        return new MyClass(someString);
    }
}

It is true use the base (something) to call the base class constructor, but in case of overloading use the this keyword

public ClassName() : this(par1,par2)
{
// do not call the constructor it is called in the this.
// the base key- word is used to call a inherited constructor   
} 

// Hint used overload as often as needed do not write the same code 2 or more times

public class MyExceptionClass : Exception
{
    public MyExceptionClass(string message,
      Exception innerException): base(message, innerException)
    {
        //other stuff here
    }
}

You can pass inner exception to one of the constructors.

From Framework Design Guidelines and FxCop rules.:

1. Custom Exception should have a name that ends with Exception

    class MyException : Exception

2. Exception should be public

    public class MyException : Exception

3. CA1032: Exception should implements standard constructors.

• A public parameterless constructor.
• A public constructor with one string argument.
• A public constructor with one string and Exception (as it can wrap another Exception).

• A serialization constructor protected if the type is not sealed and private if the type is sealed. Based on MSDN:

  [Serializable()]
  public class MyException : Exception
  {
    public MyException()
    {
       // Add any type-specific logic, and supply the default message.
    }
  
    public MyException(string message): base(message) 
    {
       // Add any type-specific logic.
    }
    public MyException(string message, Exception innerException): 
       base (message, innerException)
    {
       // Add any type-specific logic for inner exceptions.
    }
    protected MyException(SerializationInfo info, 
       StreamingContext context) : base(info, context)
    {
       // Implement type-specific serialization constructor logic.
    }
  }  
  

or

    [Serializable()]
    public sealed class MyException : Exception
    {
      public MyException()
      {
         // Add any type-specific logic, and supply the default message.
      }

      public MyException(string message): base(message) 
      {
         // Add any type-specific logic.
      }
      public MyException(string message, Exception innerException): 
         base (message, innerException)
      {
         // Add any type-specific logic for inner exceptions.
      }
      private MyException(SerializationInfo info, 
         StreamingContext context) : base(info, context)
      {
         // Implement type-specific serialization constructor logic.
      }
    }  

You can also do a conditional check with parameters in the constructor, which allows some flexibility.

public MyClass(object myObject=null): base(myObject ?? new myOtherObject())
{
}

or

public MyClass(object myObject=null): base(myObject==null ? new myOtherObject(): myObject)
{
}

As per some of the other answers listed here, you can pass parameters into the base class constructor. It is advised to call your base class constructor at the beginning of the constructor for your inherited class.

public class MyException : Exception
{
    public MyException(string message, string extraInfo) : base(message)
    {
    }
}

I note that in your example you never made use of the extraInfo parameter, so I assumed you might want to concatenate the extraInfo string parameter to the Message property of your exception (it seems that this is being ignored in the accepted answer and the code in your question).

This is simply achieved by invoking the base class constructor, and then updating the Message property with the extra info.

public class MyException: Exception
{
    public MyException(string message, string extraInfo) : base($"{message} Extra info: {extraInfo}")
    {
    }
}

Example, using this base class you want to derive from:

public abstract class BaseClass
{
    protected BaseClass(int a, int b, int c)
    {
    }
}

The non-compiling pseudo code you want to execute:

public class DerivedClass : BaseClass
{
    private readonly object fatData;
    
    public DerivedClass(int m)
    {
        var fd = new { A = 1 * m, B = 2 * m, C = 3 * m };
        base(fd.A, fd.B, fd.C); // base-constructor call
        this.fatData = fd;
    }
}

2020 version (see below for even more stringent solution)

Using newer C# features, namely out var, you can get rid of the public static factory-method.

I just found out (by accident) that out var parameter of methods called inside base-"call" flow to the constructor body. (maybe it's a C# quirk, see 2023 version for C# 1.0 compatible solution)

Using a static private helper method which produces all required base arguments (plus additional data if needed) to the outside it is just a public plain constructor:

public class DerivedClass : BaseClass
{
    private readonly object fatData;
    
    public DerivedClass(int m)
        : base(PrepareBaseParameters(m, out var b, out var c, out var fatData), b, c)
    {
        this.fatData = fatData;
        Console.WriteLine(new { b, c, fatData }.ToString());
    }

    private static int PrepareBaseParameters(int m, out int b, out int c, out object fatData)
    {
        var fd = new { A = 1 * m, B = 2 * m, C = 3 * m };
        (b, c, fatData) = (fd.B, fd.C, fd); // Tuples not required but nice to use
        return fd.A;
    }
}

2023 update

All you need is an additional private constructor and an accompanying private static factory method which prepares the data for the new private constructor using the same input as for the public ctor:

public class DerivedClass : BaseClass
{
    private readonly FatData fatData;

    public DerivedClass(int m)
        : this(PrepareBaseParameters(m))
    {
        Console.WriteLine(this.fatData.ToString());
    }

    private DerivedClass(FatData fd)
        : base(fd.A, fd.B, fd.C)
    {
        this.fatData = fd;
    }

    private static FatData PrepareBaseParameters(int m)
    {
        // might be any (non-async) code which e.x. calls factory methods 
        var fd = new FatData(A: 1 * m, B: 2 * m, C: 3 * m);
        return fd;
    }

    private readonly record struct FatData(int A, int B, int C);
}

No special C# version needed, the C#10 record struct just for shortness, will work with any C#1.0 class, too.

This version seems to be slightly longer but it is far easier to read and understand.

public class MyException : Exception
{
    public MyException() { }
    public MyException(string msg) : base(msg) { }
    public MyException(string msg, Exception inner) : base(msg, inner) { }
}